2011
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/83/01/015201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking asymmetric rotors in mass regionA∼100–110

Abstract: The staggering indices S(I, I−1, I−2) versus spin (I ) graphs have been plotted using known experimental data along with empirical calculations of Varshney et al (2007 Phys. Scr. 75 451) in some nuclei of mass region A ∼ 100-110. Most of the transional nuclei of Mo, Ru and Pd isotopes have been found to be triaxial. The known B(E2) values of these nuclei are also close to the triaxial rotor model predictions (Davydov A S and Filippov G F 1958 Nucl. Phys. 8 237).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The γ-intensity ratio between the 266-keV and 153-keV transitions measured here was consistent within experimental uncertainties with the value measured by Kanazawa et al [37], but not consistent with the value measured by Casten et al [38]. Our value for the intensity of the 266-keV γ ray per 100 γ rays of 153 keV is 64 (13), while those previous measurements recorded 41.7(90) [37] and 28.9(41) [28,38], respectively.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The γ-intensity ratio between the 266-keV and 153-keV transitions measured here was consistent within experimental uncertainties with the value measured by Kanazawa et al [37], but not consistent with the value measured by Casten et al [38]. Our value for the intensity of the 266-keV γ ray per 100 γ rays of 153 keV is 64 (13), while those previous measurements recorded 41.7(90) [37] and 28.9(41) [28,38], respectively.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]). The precise origins and evolutions of such phenomena are still not well-understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies indicate that in Mo and Ru isotopes, the coexisting shapes tend to merge to form relatively rigid, triaxially-deformed ground states [22,25,36,43,48,49] or, in the least, potential energy surfaces that are γ-soft [21,23,[50][51][52]. The rigidity of triaxial deformation in nuclei remains an open question, but the general consensus is that triaxiality occurs in isotopes that are transitional between two regions where widely different shapes are favored: either between prolate and oblate regions, or between spherical and substantially (quadrupole) deformed regions [14,21,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the atomic nuclei are known to have spherical or prolate ground state shapes except in few regions on the nuclear chart where oblate and triaxial shapes [23,24,33] are predominant. The nuclear masses around A∼100 [7,[13][14][15]17,28,29,32] offer an interesting region to explore shape changes and shape coexistence in the vicinity of Z > 40 and then transition towards less deformed to spherical while approaching shell closure Z = 50.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%