Seeing through the face of deception

Pavlidis, Ioannis; Eberhardt, Norman L.; Levine, James A.

doi:10.1038/415035a

Cited by 198 publications

(138 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

129

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some evidence supports the link between specifi c emotional states and certain physiological responses, such as startle/surprise and increased periorbital temperature (Pavlidis and Levine, 2002). However, there is no evidence supporting the assumption that autonomic and somatic responses refl ect intentional deception.…”

Section: Psychophysiological Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Thermal Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…73 DoDPI reports 70% (Ryan and Pollina, 2002), Pavlidis (2004) and Pavlidis and Levine (2001) report 78%, andPavlidis et al (2002) report 75% (this is probably because the papers report a variety of cohort sizes).…”

Section: Thermal Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of these studies was conducted by the DoDPI in conjunction with a group from Honeywell Laboratories led by Ioannis Pavlidis. These two groups have produced a series of publications (Ryan and Pollina, 2002;Pavlidis and Levine, 2001;Pavlidis et al, 2002;Pavlidis, 2004), all of which appear to be based on the same study originally conducted at DoDPI. The study used a mock crime scenario in which participants stabbed a mannequin and stole its money.…”

Section: Thermal Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study used a mock crime scenario in which participants stabbed a mannequin and stole its money. The papers report different results in regard to the percentage of correctly identifi ed guilty subjects (subjects who lied about their innocence):73 DoDPI reports 70% (Ryan and Pollina, 2002), Pavlidis (2004) and Pavlidis and Levine (2001) report 78%, andPavlidis et al (2002) report 75% (this is probably because the papers report a variety of cohort sizes).This thermal imaging study was conducted in conjunction with a polygraph examination. According to the DoDPI report, thermal imaging of the eye and nose facial region, combined with the polygraph, resulted in the highest accuracy rates: 83% for polygraph and SST of the eye and nose regions, compared to 67% for the polygraph alone.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art Foundations for the Future

2006

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. REPORT DATE DEC 20062 Same as Report (SAR)18 About the Intelligence Science Board MissionThe Intelligence Science Board was chartered in August 2002 and advises the Offi ce of the Director of National Intelligence and senior Intelligence Community leaders on emerging scientifi c and technical issues of special importance to the Intelligence Community. The mission of the Board is to provide the Intelligence Community with outside expert advice and unconventional thinking, early notice of advances in science and technology, insight into new applications of existing technology, and special studies that require skills or organizational approaches not resident within the Intelligence Community. The Board also creates linkages between the Intelligence Community and the scientifi c and technical communities. ImpactBoard members initiate studies and assessments in topic areas where they believe that the Board's interdisciplinary expertise and experience could benefi t the Intelligence Community. In addition, the Board responds to tasking from the Associate Director of National Intelligence for Science and Technology and from the heads of elements of the Intelligence Community. All ISB tasks are mutually agreed to by the ISB and by the Associate Director of National Intelligence for Science and Technology. The Board's procedures for developing and communicating its fi ndings and advice will remain as fl exible and informal as is possible, consistent with the mission. MembershipThe Board is composed of approximately 25 members whose range of expertise encompasses the physical and biological sciences, information technology and communications, information policy, and the law, among others. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not refl ect the offi cial policy or position of the Department of Defense, the National Foreign Intelligence Community or the U.S. Government EDUCING INFORMATION Interrogation: Science and Art The National Defense Intelligence College supports and encourages research on intelligence issues that distills lessons and improves Intelligence Community capabilities for policy-level and operational consumersEducing Information: Interrogatio...

show abstract

Section: Psychophysiological Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Thermal Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Thermal Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Thermal Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art Foundations for the Future

2006

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Interviewing to Detect Deception

and¹,

Granhag²

2006

Offenders' Memories of Violent Crimes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DePaulo et al.'s (2003) meta-analysis of verbal and nonverbal cues to deception showed that cues to deception are faint and unreliable. If liars do not spontaneously display diagnostic cues to deceit, a logical step is to make sure that investigators elicit or enhance such cues in interviews through specific interview technique. Such interview techniques were scarce in the nonverbal and verbal cues to deception domain, but recently researchers have developed alternative protocols which have their roots in cognition and based on the assumption that questions can be asked that are more difficult for liars to answer than for truth tellers. They will be discussed in the first part of this article. Traditionally, lie detection in a forensic context concentrated on policesuspect interview settings. However, in the wake of high profile international terrorist attacks, the importance of identifying terrorist networks and gathering intelligence about the activities of such groups became paramount. Deception detection in intelligence interviews differs in several ways from deception detection in traditional police-suspect interviews and requires innovative deception research. In the second part of this article we will discuss the emerging literature in this domain.

show abstract

Detecting Deception

Vrij¹

2006

Practical Psychology for Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Seeing through the face of deception

Cited by 198 publications

References 6 publications

Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art Foundations for the Future

Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art Foundations for the Future

Interviewing to Detect Deception

Detecting Deception

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About