2005
DOI: 10.2752/174322005778054537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing the self “in frame”: early new england material practice and puritan piety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 For discussions of this, see Orsi 2016:2-5, 8-10, 30-42, 249-52;Wharton 2014:414. For examples of this, see Bruggeman 2011:35-50;Kammen 2010:10, 18;Laderman 1996:7. 3 For studies of Protestant material culture, see Brummitt 2020:13, n. 10;Cray 1990;McDannell 1995;Morgan 1999;Promey 1993Promey , 2005 For examples of Orsi's discussion of the Catholicism = presence, Protestantism = absence dichotomy in scholarship, and how this has manifested in terms of secularism and metaphor regarding relics used by Protestants, see Barnett 2013:29-37, 49, 51-3;Lutz 2011:128-9;Stabile 2004:222-7. 5 For a discussion of lively memory objects, see Brummitt 2018:22-31.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 For discussions of this, see Orsi 2016:2-5, 8-10, 30-42, 249-52;Wharton 2014:414. For examples of this, see Bruggeman 2011:35-50;Kammen 2010:10, 18;Laderman 1996:7. 3 For studies of Protestant material culture, see Brummitt 2020:13, n. 10;Cray 1990;McDannell 1995;Morgan 1999;Promey 1993Promey , 2005 For examples of Orsi's discussion of the Catholicism = presence, Protestantism = absence dichotomy in scholarship, and how this has manifested in terms of secularism and metaphor regarding relics used by Protestants, see Barnett 2013:29-37, 49, 51-3;Lutz 2011:128-9;Stabile 2004:222-7. 5 For a discussion of lively memory objects, see Brummitt 2018:22-31.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second perspective, while acknowledging the important symbolic functions of religious material culture, has focused more attention on how the physical characteristics of objects play an important constitutive role in forming and consolidating religious identities (e.g., Engelke ; Keane ; Kilde ; Konieczny ; Mahmood ; Morgan ; Orsi ; Promey ; Zubrzycki ). While the actual kinds of material investigated vary substantially from study to study, scholars who focus on the material characteristics of religious artifacts converge on the importance of what one might term the religious object's presentational dimension.…”
Section: Literature and Theoretical Framework: Conceptualizing Religimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitchell, on the other hand, has preferred the phrasing "visual culture" to "visual studies" because he wishes to communicate his commitment to the subject's "contructedness, its symbolic and imaginal formations" (Mitchell in Dikovitskaya 2005: 243-4). David Morgan (Morgan 2005: 32) agrees with Mitchell and others in foregrounding the "constructivist emphasis" and also in subtly shifting the punctuation from artists and objects to practices of image production and reception (Promey 1993(Promey , 2005Morgan & Promey 2001;Mitchell 2002). In Morgan's recent study, "visual culture is what images, acts of seeing, and attendant intellectual, emotional, and perceptual sensibilities do to build, maintain, or transform the worlds in which people live."…”
Section: Nomenclature and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xvi and xxix;Morgan & Promey 2001;Roeder 1993, esp. p. 286;Morgan 2005;and Promey 2005). It historicizes, contextualizes, and reconfi gures earlier critiques of utilitarian and instrumental value as well as philosophical notions of aesthetics as a domain of transcendence and disinterested refl ection.…”
Section: Subjects Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%