2014
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing the forest beyond the trees

Abstract: In a recent paper (Mitchard et al. 2014, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23, 935-946) a new map of forest biomass based on a geostatistical model of field data for the Amazon (and surrounding forests) was presented and contrasted with two earlier maps based on remotesensing data Saatchi et al. (2011; RS1) and Baccini et al. (2012; RS2). Mitchard et al. concluded that both the earlier remote-sensing based maps were incorrect because they did not conform to Mitchard et al. interpretation of the field-based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). In the light of the considerable uncertainties between RS products, as well as with site data [79][80][81] , we accepted the uncertainty we introduce through tree-height-based downscaling for the advantage of consistency, because national forest C-stock data are available with global coverage 26 . Other approaches that have been proposed for downscaling national carbon stock information, for example, following the pattern of NPP 82 , would result in one national τbact value for forest.…”
Section: Carbon Stock Of the Actual Vegetation (Scact )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). In the light of the considerable uncertainties between RS products, as well as with site data [79][80][81] , we accepted the uncertainty we introduce through tree-height-based downscaling for the advantage of consistency, because national forest C-stock data are available with global coverage 26 . Other approaches that have been proposed for downscaling national carbon stock information, for example, following the pattern of NPP 82 , would result in one national τbact value for forest.…”
Section: Carbon Stock Of the Actual Vegetation (Scact )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitchard et al [129] found that these maps do not agree with the spatial distribution of AGB in permanent Amazon field plots and that the uncertainties quantified in a comparison with 413 ground plots far exceed those reported by the studies. Saatchi et al [131] responded to Mitchard et al [129] arguing that, aside from methodological flaws in the interpolation approach, using 413 plots from different periods ). Adapted with permission from Balzter et al [68] between 1956 and 2013 only represent 404.6 ha out of 650 million ha of forest in the Amazon and without a rigorously designed and extensive in situ forest inventory strategy are not representative of the AGB trends in the region.…”
Section: Large Mapping Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been observed in most forest types globally [6][7][8]. In addition, the paucity of field inventory plots in most of the unmanaged forests due to the difficulty of the access and cost of establishing large plots has been a source of uncertainty in the use of regression model techniques [9,10]. Reducing such uncertainty would require the establishment of larger and more accurately located plots in global forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%