2022
DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2064518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Seeing’ our tamariki in longitudinal studies: exploring the complexity of ethnic identification trajectories within Growing Up in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diverse cultural backgrounds present in New Zealand can lead to variations in how individuals from different ethnic groups or levels of deprivation interpret and respond to the scale items. As a result, a single baseline for comparison is not appropriate due to these cultural differences (Atatoa Carr et al, 2022; Hobbs et al, 2019). In addition, cultural and contextual differences play a role in the observed non-invariance, and it is important to recognise and respect these variations to avoid imposing uniform measurement standards across diverse groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diverse cultural backgrounds present in New Zealand can lead to variations in how individuals from different ethnic groups or levels of deprivation interpret and respond to the scale items. As a result, a single baseline for comparison is not appropriate due to these cultural differences (Atatoa Carr et al, 2022; Hobbs et al, 2019). In addition, cultural and contextual differences play a role in the observed non-invariance, and it is important to recognise and respect these variations to avoid imposing uniform measurement standards across diverse groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 40% of Pacific children also lived in deprived households, as indicated by their caregiver reporting multiple experiences of socioeconomic deprivation (NZiDep scores of 4 or 5) in the past year. This reflects entrenched social inequities [ 31 ], institutionalized racism [ 28 ], and impacts of discriminatory immigration, employment, and social policy practices [ 32 ] experienced by Pacific peoples in NZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some critique of the use of large linked administrative data set for research, and in New Zealand, issues have been raised regarding consent and also indigenous data sovereignty. 72 74 Such an expansive set, while surrounded by privacy and ‘common good’ protections, opens the possibility of misuse. The data collections are frequently deficit focussed and measures are not selected by populations but by governments and administrative agencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%