“…Restoration researchers have -amongst others -attempted to chart the positive cognitive (for a review: Ohly et al, 2016), affective (for a review: McMahan & Estes, 2015) and psychophysiological effects of nature contact (e.g., Ulrich et al, 1991;Hartig, Evans, Jamner, Davis, & Gärling, 2003;Chang, Hammitt, Chen, Machnik, & Su, 2008;Van Den Berg & Custers, 2011). Efforts have been made to determine the optimal dose (Barton & Pretty, 2010;Shanahan et al, 2016) and modality (e.g., virtual versus real nature; Pals, Steg, Dontje, Siero, & van Der Zee, 2014) of nature for restoration, while research has also demonstrated how restorative nature effects can depend on group characteristics (e.g., elderly: Ottosson & Grahn, 2005;children: Taylor & Kuo, 2008;Ulset, Vitaro, Brendgen, Bekkhus, & Borge, 2017), on individuals' salient identities (e.g., Morton, van der Bles, & Haslam, 2017) or on the life stage one is in (Scopelliti & Giuliani, 2004).…”