2022
DOI: 10.1002/acp.4001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing is believing? A systematic review of credibility perceptions of live and remote video‐mediated communication in legal settings

Abstract: There has been a dramatic increase in use of remote communication via audio‐visual technology since the COVID‐19 pandemic. This includes use in complex legal hearings where decisions rely heavily on credibility assessments of an individual and their interview statement. This is particularly relevant in legal settings where negative assessments can have adverse outcomes such as asylum applications which can result in deportation. Increasing use of remote communication technology raises the question of what rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This question, however, is highly relevant. Because a major difference between testifying modalities lies in the observation and appraisal of nonverbal behaviour (Denault & Patterson, 2021), and children testifying via live CCTV can be judged more negatively than children testifying in person (Goodman et al, 1998; Orcutt et al, 2001; see also Given‐Wilson & Memon, 2022). However, those limitations in no way make the results of our descriptive study any less relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This question, however, is highly relevant. Because a major difference between testifying modalities lies in the observation and appraisal of nonverbal behaviour (Denault & Patterson, 2021), and children testifying via live CCTV can be judged more negatively than children testifying in person (Goodman et al, 1998; Orcutt et al, 2001; see also Given‐Wilson & Memon, 2022). However, those limitations in no way make the results of our descriptive study any less relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if they show neutral or positive emotions, they are often deemed less credible, and likewise if child victims show anger (Wessel et al, 2016). Furthermore, if children testify via CCTV, they can be judged more negatively than children testifying in person (Goodman et al, 1998; Orcutt et al, 2001; see also Given‐Wilson & Memon, 2022). This may be due to a loss of emotional impact (Davies, 1992; Landström et al, 2007; Orcutt et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Impact Of Demeanour For Child Witnessesmentioning
confidence: 99%