1999
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199903000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing into Old Age: Vision Function Beyond Acuity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
248
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
17
248
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies in other countries reported the change of stereopsis with age. However, reports by Allen, 19 Bell et al, 20 HaegerstomPortnoy et al, 21 and Rubin et al 22 all featured the shortcoming that the visual acuity measured at the time of the assessment of stereopsis was not adjusted. In other words, stereopsis may be decreased in the elderly due to the decrease of visual acuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies in other countries reported the change of stereopsis with age. However, reports by Allen, 19 Bell et al, 20 HaegerstomPortnoy et al, 21 and Rubin et al 22 all featured the shortcoming that the visual acuity measured at the time of the assessment of stereopsis was not adjusted. In other words, stereopsis may be decreased in the elderly due to the decrease of visual acuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, glare effects are studied in ref. [23] but are related to VA only with a small constant loss in younger subjects and with an exponential increase after age 55.…”
Section: Model Elements Of the Changing Eyementioning
confidence: 92%
“…[15][16][17] West et al 18 reported that if more sophisticated tests of visual function such as contrast sensitivity, glare recovery, and dark acuity tests were used, then up to 60% of elderly subjects assessed with these tests failed them, compared to only 20% of the same cohort who failed standard high-contrast (Snellen) visual acuity tests. Similarly, it is now well recognised that standard clinical tests of a patient's visual field may also underestimate the peripheral visual field problems in this group of patients.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%