2018
DOI: 10.1177/1748895818780193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Seeing’ gender, war and terror

Abstract: This article explores the questions posed for criminology when war and terror are seen through a gendered lens. Following Barberet this lens demands blurring the boundaries between peacetime, wartime and post-conflict situations. These boundaries frame the nomos of criminology and once challenged the connections to be made between the 'callousness' of femicide and the 'callousness' of environmental destruction are exposed. Using photographs as the vehicle through which such a challenge can be maintained, the g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps this is no surprise given criminology’s history of ignoring studies which have women as their focus (Daly & Chesney-Lind, 1988; Cook, 2016). It also echoes the discipline’s tendency to see violence in the street, in the home, and by the state as “separate and separable” (Walklate, 2018, p. 621). Criminology’s failure to engage with Ireland’s gendered mass confinement may also relate to the perceived geographic irrelevance of Ireland and its deviation from the template of Britain and the United States (Brangan, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps this is no surprise given criminology’s history of ignoring studies which have women as their focus (Daly & Chesney-Lind, 1988; Cook, 2016). It also echoes the discipline’s tendency to see violence in the street, in the home, and by the state as “separate and separable” (Walklate, 2018, p. 621). Criminology’s failure to engage with Ireland’s gendered mass confinement may also relate to the perceived geographic irrelevance of Ireland and its deviation from the template of Britain and the United States (Brangan, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Crucially, the Irish case presents gendered violence as a collectivist harm perpetrated by the state. Drawing on Walklate’s (2018) argument that criminology is unable to see the interconnections between peace-time violence, war-time violence, and postconflict violence, and to integrate this with the violence of the state, we can see that the contemporary concerns of the discipline close off other ways of seeing. Just as Kelly (1988) proposed a continuum of sexual violence, so we suggest a multidimensional understanding of gendered violence with the state at one pole and the individual actor at the other.…”
Section: Criminology Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jewkes raises concerns that emotional investment on the part of the researcher may compromise research in terms of ethics and rigour; however, as Hollway and Jefferson (2013) point out, it is research without feeling which is unethical, further arguing that objectivity comes with subjectivity and a strong commitment to reflexivity. Furthermore, rather than being ‘too’ close to the subject matter and consequently lacking in objectivity, beginning with emotion and admitting the influence of the self opens up space for enriching political and academic analysis and developing the criminological imagination (Jewkes, 2011; Walklate, 2018). It also offers an ethical opportunity for the criminologist to take a pause and think more carefully about the victims and violence we frequently make reference to – as an act of remembrance (Wilson et al, 2016), commemoration and ‘bearing witness’ (Walklate et al, 2015).…”
Section: Conclusion: Emotion Haunting and The Ethical Obligations Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%