2011
DOI: 10.5897/ajb11.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeding method and rate influence on weed suppression in aerobic rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the seeding methods the more grain yield was recorded with line sowing (S 2 ) (3161) and was significantly superior over broadcasting (S 1 ) (2366) which might be due to less competition between crop and weeds and high yield attributes recorded with line sowing. Similar results were reported by Anwar et al, (2011), Moorthy and Rao (1991). The grain yield was significantly influenced by the interaction of seeding methods and weed management practices.…”
Section: Yieldsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the seeding methods the more grain yield was recorded with line sowing (S 2 ) (3161) and was significantly superior over broadcasting (S 1 ) (2366) which might be due to less competition between crop and weeds and high yield attributes recorded with line sowing. Similar results were reported by Anwar et al, (2011), Moorthy and Rao (1991). The grain yield was significantly influenced by the interaction of seeding methods and weed management practices.…”
Section: Yieldsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Close observation of data indicated that among seeding methods line sowing produced significantly higher number of panicles m -2 (257.0) compared with broadcasting (234.8) similar results reported by Anwar et al, (2011).…”
Section: No Of Panicles M -2supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Planting geometry of a crop affects the interception of solar radiation, crop canopy coverage, dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate (Anwar et al, 2011). The closer planting geometry causes competition among plants for light, water, and nutrients which consequently slow down growth as well as the grain yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant space determines solar radiation interception, crop canopy coverage and total dry matter accumulation (Anwar et al, 2011). Also, several studies had shown that the closer planting may cause mutual shading which may direct to intra-specific competition that increases the problems of lodging (Bond et al, 2005), insect pest infestation (Tan et al, 2000) and even rat injuries (Castin and Moody, 1989).…”
Section: Issn: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 5 (2017) Pp 729-738mentioning
confidence: 99%