A recessive mutation hsi2 of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) expressing luciferase (LUC) under control of a short promoter derived from a sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) sporamin gene (Spo min TLUC) caused enhanced LUC expression under both lowand high-sugar conditions, which was not due to increased level of abscisic acid. The hsi2 mutant contained a nonsense mutation in a gene encoding a protein with B3 DNA-binding domain. HSI2 and two other Arabidopsis proteins appear to constitute a novel subfamily of B3 domain proteins distinct from ABI3, FUS3, and LEC2, which are transcription activators involved in seed development. The C-terminal part of HSI2 subfamily proteins contained a sequence similar to the ERFassociated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif. Deletion of the C-terminal portion of HSI2 lost in the hsi2 mutant caused reduced nuclear targeting of HSI2. Null allele of HSI2 showed even higher Spo min TLUC expression than the hsi2 mutant, whereas overexpression of HSI2 reduced the LUC expression. Transient coexpression of 35STHSI2 with Spo min TLUC in protoplasts repressed the expression of LUC activity, and deletion or mutation of the EAR motif significantly reduced the repression activity of HSI2. These results indicate that HSI2 and related proteins are B3 domain-EAR motif active transcription repressors.In addition to transcriptional activators, transcriptional repressors play important roles in the regulation of transcription. Transcriptional repressors are basically classified into passive repressors and active repressors (Hanna-Rose and Hansen, 1996;Thiel et al., 2004). Passive repressors do not have intrinsic repressing activity and inhibit the activation of transcription by inhibiting the function of transcriptional activators through a competition with activators for binding with DNA or a formation of inactive heterodimers with activators. On the other hand, active repressors inhibit transcription in an activatorindependent manner by binding with basic transcription factors or corepressors.The expression of a number of plant genes is regulated by changes in sugar status via multiple signal transduction pathways (for review, see Koch, 1996;Smeekens, 2000;Rolland et al., 2002). Genetic analyses of sugar signaling mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), obtained by genetic screen based on inhibition of germination and early seedling development by sugars, revealed a close link between sugar signaling and the production of ethylene and abscisic acid (ABA; for review, see Gazzarrini and McCourt, 2001;Rook and Bevan, 2003). In addition, direct screening based on sugar-responsive expression of endogenous genes or transgenes with reporters also resulted in identification of mutants with altered sugar-responsive gene expression (Dijkwel et al., 1997;Martin et al., 1997;Mita et al., 1997aMita et al., , 1997bRook et al., 2001; Baier et al., 2004). In general, these mutants affected the expression of a subset of sugar-regulated genes, and mutation either diminished or enhanced the sugarresponsive ex...