2012
DOI: 10.1079/pavsnnr20127013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed orchard genetics.

Abstract: Seed orchards represent the link between tree breeding and silvicultural activities. Their genetic efficiency is of vital importance as it determines the extent of genetic gain and diversity of future forest tree plantations. Given their importance, seed orchard genetics has received increased scientific and managerial scrutiny. Virtually all aspects affecting seed orchard genetic efficiency have been thoroughly investigated, including their biological model, underpinning assumptions and management practices d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contamination rate varied widely among the studied years and ranged between 10% for 2005 where the two intrusive pollination environment manipulation treatments (bloom-delay and SMP) were concurrently implemented 3 , and 28% for 2008, which was developed under natural pollination (Table 1). Years with SMP treatment alone (2007 4 and 2009 6 ) produced intermediate contamination rates (13–18%) between those of the concurrent pollination environment manipulation treatments (10%) 5 and natural pollination (28%). Furthermore, the difference between 2007 4 and 2009 6 could be a reflection of the amount of SMP efforts dedicated to small verses large crops and may highlight SMP ineffectiveness during years with large crops (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The contamination rate varied widely among the studied years and ranged between 10% for 2005 where the two intrusive pollination environment manipulation treatments (bloom-delay and SMP) were concurrently implemented 3 , and 28% for 2008, which was developed under natural pollination (Table 1). Years with SMP treatment alone (2007 4 and 2009 6 ) produced intermediate contamination rates (13–18%) between those of the concurrent pollination environment manipulation treatments (10%) 5 and natural pollination (28%). Furthermore, the difference between 2007 4 and 2009 6 could be a reflection of the amount of SMP efforts dedicated to small verses large crops and may highlight SMP ineffectiveness during years with large crops (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Years with SMP treatment alone (2007 4 and 2009 6 ) produced intermediate contamination rates (13–18%) between those of the concurrent pollination environment manipulation treatments (10%) 5 and natural pollination (28%). Furthermore, the difference between 2007 4 and 2009 6 could be a reflection of the amount of SMP efforts dedicated to small verses large crops and may highlight SMP ineffectiveness during years with large crops (Table 1). It is interesting to note that the contamination rate for all intrusive pollination environment manipulation treatments 3,4,6 (10–18%) were lower than that observed for natural pollination (28%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Assuming that background pollen sources carry zero level of improvement, the reduction in the genetic gain equals half of the pollen contamination rate. There are a number of factors that influence the magnitude of pollen contamination: (1) the species and its mating system, (2) reproductive phenology of the selected as well as outside-orchard parents, (3) size of the orchard, and/or (4) the degree of isolation and actual environmental conditions (reviewed in Funda & El-Kassaby 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%