2006
DOI: 10.1086/505762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed Dormancy and Delayed Flowering in Monocarpic Plants: Selective Interactions in a Stochastic Environment

Abstract: We explore the effects of temporal variation in multiple demographic rates on the joint evolution of delayed reproduction and seed dormancy using integral projection models (IPMs). To do this, we extend the standard IPM to include a discrete state variable representing the number of seeds in the seed bank, density-dependent recruitment, and temporal variation in demography. Parameter estimates for Carlina vulgaris and Carduus nutans are obtained from long-term studies. Carlina is relatively long lived and has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(75 reference statements)
2
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, we can establish whether there is a particular flowering or germination strategy that, once established, cannot be invaded by any rare mutant strategies; this strategy is the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). ESSs identified using this approach very closely match observed flowering size and germination delays in three monocarpic plant systems Rees et al 2006;Ellner & Rees 2007).…”
Section: Accommodating Real-world Complexitiessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, we can establish whether there is a particular flowering or germination strategy that, once established, cannot be invaded by any rare mutant strategies; this strategy is the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). ESSs identified using this approach very closely match observed flowering size and germination delays in three monocarpic plant systems Rees et al 2006;Ellner & Rees 2007).…”
Section: Accommodating Real-world Complexitiessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Linking traits to their effect on bet-hedging then becomes particularly difficult, since all the different pathways and their effect on both the mean and the variance in fitness need to be accounted for. The partitioning approach discussed above (see also Rees et al 2006) for decomposing the effect of different sources of temporal variation on the ESS, although intuitively sensible, needs a firmer theoretical foundation. It is likely some of the approaches developed by Peter Chesson for analysing community dynamics in stochastic environments (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistent use of 'bet hedging' in titles, abstracts or keywords would facilitate the identification of research common to this area. Some of the most sophisticated treatments of bet hedging [17,85] recognize implicitly that fluctuating selection will result in evolutionarily stable strategies that may differ from those that maximize average expected fitness, and contain no specific searchable reference to the field of bet hedging. The coverage of the empirical literature is thus as comprehensive as possible in spanning taxa and range of tests.…”
Section: The Empirical Evidence For Bet Hedgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, empirical evidence for bet hedging remains scant [12]. Evidence is restricted to demonstrations of interspecific divergence [13] or population differentiation [14,15] in putative bet-hedging traits across environments that differ in predictability, or the documentation of the evolution of candidate bet-hedging traits under conditions in which they may be advantageous [16,17], with very few strong studies confirming fitness benefits of putative bethedging traits under fluctuating conditions [18][19][20][21]. Tests of bet hedging under field conditions are difficult because they require evaluating both environmental variance and its fitness effects over multiple generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%