2002
DOI: 10.1139/b02-112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed cone structure in conifers in relation to development and pollination: a biological approach

Abstract: Seed production in conifers involves an extended sequence of developmental events that may take as long as 3 years to complete. There is a conflict between two major processes: initial pollination of ovules and subsequent maturation of seeds after fertilization. The conflict arises because ovules must be exposed at first to receive pollen (the gymno-ovulate condition), and subsequently seeds must be protected during maturation (the angiospermous condition). The "Florin model", which shows that the coniferous c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But then what is its adaptive function? We do not consider the broad requirements for protecting the ovules and maturing and dispersing the seeds, which are reviewed elsewhere (20). Instead, we offer two further adaptive interpretations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But then what is its adaptive function? We do not consider the broad requirements for protecting the ovules and maturing and dispersing the seeds, which are reviewed elsewhere (20). Instead, we offer two further adaptive interpretations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ovulate cones in most Podocarpaceae consist of one or more fertile units, each composed of a fertile bract subtending an axillary epimatium that bears a single adaxial inverted ovule. In our matrix, the podocarpaceous epimatium was postulated as homologous to the bract/scale complex tissues enclosing the seed in Araucaria (table B1) because it represents the most accepted theory (Tomlinson and Takaso 2002). However, the reconstruction of this character on the MPT is ambiguous for Araucariaceae, and therefore, it is not possible to support one state as derived or primitive for this character.…”
Section: Relationships Of Extant Araucariaceaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although angio-ovuly is the only consistent difference that separates angiosperms from gymnosperms [11,18,36], Herendeen et al [1] added three more features to the criterion and, incredibly, they failed to Natural Science obey their OWN rule themselves because the first "exemplar" early angiosperm Monetianthus does satisfy their own criterion! Herendeen et al [1] rejected Juraherba bodae as an angiosperm based on an excuse: "the leaf is too thin" (a feature not among the criterion they proposed).…”
Section: Herendeen Et Al Failed To Remain Consistent Within Their Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pre-Cretaceous angiosperms were recognized on the basis of presence of enclosed ovules, a feature proposed and applied by various authors [11,18,36]. Such a parsimony in wording has little to with authority of Herendeen et al but reflects their diffidence in their treatments.…”
Section: Herendeen Et Al Were Over-brief In Their Rejecting Jurassicmentioning
confidence: 99%