1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00076.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

See What I Mean: Interpreting the Meaning of Communication by People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract: In a social and political climate which encourages active participation in decision-making by people who have severe and profound intellectual disabilities, the onus is often on practitioners, carers and advocates to represent the wishes and interests of individuals. The issue of the validity of their interpretations is then foregrounded. This paper discusses theoretical issues associated with the development of guidelines to support a process of validation. It is argued that meaning should be viewed as the ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
187
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
187
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the study also offer some support to the contention that adults with profound intellectual disability have different engagement patterns depending on the stimulation or interaction levels that they encounter in the setting in which they find themselves [15]. It was clear that the participants related variably to stimuli such as being fed, engaging in a one to one talk session and engaging in a high sensory stimulation setting.…”
Section: Study Number Approachsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The findings of the study also offer some support to the contention that adults with profound intellectual disability have different engagement patterns depending on the stimulation or interaction levels that they encounter in the setting in which they find themselves [15]. It was clear that the participants related variably to stimuli such as being fed, engaging in a one to one talk session and engaging in a high sensory stimulation setting.…”
Section: Study Number Approachsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…But another reason why teachers have gained the confidence to do this risk work throughout their daily interactions in schools is that they are increasingly supported to do so by educational frameworks. Particularly influential have been the Intensive Interaction approach (Nind and Hewett 1994) and the 'See What I Mean' guidance (Grove et al 1999(Grove et al , 2000. For children with profound impairment, Intensive Interaction provides a curricular framework and pedagogical guidance that supports teachers' self-belief in their judgements (Nind and Thomas 2005) and the risks they take and benefits they accrue in treating apparently non-communicative behaviours as if they are communicative (Nind and Hewett 1994).…”
Section: Intensive Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, it is the close caregiver who has this knowledge; also functioning interaction in the form of turn-taking occurs in the daily life for children with multiple disabilities (Wilder & Granlund 2003). Furthermore, as caregivers also function as mediators (Grove, Bunning, Porter & Olsson 1999) it is important to take their general practices, ideas and beliefs into account when investigating interaction (Super & Harkness 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%