See-through techniques for referential awareness in collaborative virtual reality

Argelaguet, Ferran; Kulik, Аlexander; Kunert, André; Andújar, Carlos; Froehlich, Bernd

doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.01.003

Cited by 43 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Accordingly, this method is highly useful for studying ISP compliance issues and thus has been increasingly used in the ISP and computer-abuse literature (e.g. Siponen & Vance, 2010;Argelaguet et al, 2011;Guo et al, 2011;Hu et al, 2011;Lowry et al, 2013).…”

Section: Is Security Policy Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposing the control‐reactance compliance model (CRCM) to explain opposing motivations to comply with organisational information security policies

Lowry

Moody

2014

Information Systems Journal

173

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organisations increasingly rely on information and related systems, which are also a source of risk. Unfortunately, employees represent the greatest risk to organisational information because they are the most frequent source of information security breaches. To address this ‘weak link’ in organisational security, most organisations have strict information security policies (ISPs) designed to thwart employee information abuses. Regrettably, these ISPs are only partially effective because employees often ignore them, circumvent them or even do the opposite of what management desires. Research on attempts to increase ISP compliance has produced similarly mixed results. Lack of compliance with ISPs is a widespread organisational issue that increasingly bears disproportionately large direct and qualitative costs that undermine strategy. Consequently, the purpose of our study was to contribute to the understanding of both motivations to comply with new ISPs and motivations to react negatively against them. To do so, we proposed an innovative model, the control‐reactance compliance model (CRCM), which combines organisational control theory – a model that explains ISP compliance – with reactance theory – a model used to explain ISP noncompliance. To test CRCM, we used a sample of 320 working professionals in a variety of industries to examine the likely organisational outcomes of the delivery of a new ISP to employees in the form of a typical memo sent throughout an organisation. We largely found support for CRCM, and this study concludes with an explanation of the model's contributions to research and practice related to organisational ISP compliance.

show abstract

Section: Is Security Policy Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposing the control‐reactance compliance model (CRCM) to explain opposing motivations to comply with organisational information security policies

Lowry

Moody

2014

Information Systems Journal

173

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tools for interacting with building elements in the stereoscopic multi-user system are developed by Argelaguet et al (Argelaguet et al, 2011). In this research, however, it is shown, how the construction control panel is integrated into the stereoscopic multi-user system.…”

Section: Figure 12 Construction Control Panelmentioning

confidence: 99%

4D Site Installation Planning in Virtual Reality for Multi-user

Hollermann¹,

Bargstädt²

2014

Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The site installation for a construction site should be optimized for the environment, the construction itself and the construction methods. To support the process of site installation planning a perspective projection in combination with head tracking of the participants in the planning process is helpful. By this, clashes between the construction and site installation equipment can be avoided. However for planning a site installation the different perspectives of involved parties at the same time are needed. But in a perspective projection one cannot point out things so that others can see what is pointed at, because all get the same perspective projection. Therefore a multi-user environment with perspective projection is helpful. Furthermore the interaction between different experts is needed to find the optimum. A perspective projection in combination with head tracking for multi-users can solve this problem. Since quite some time product models like building information models can be visualized in virtual reality. Only placing the objects of site installation within this BIM model is not enough because a typical construction site changes dynamically during the construction time. Therefore a product model linked with a time schedule to 4D construction model is needed as base for the planning of the construction site. Based on that, the site installation can be developed according to the requirements of the construction process. Furthermore, the objects of site installation have to be modeled with their parameters. Thus movements and processes flows can be check.

show abstract

“…If users actually want to change the configuration of the shared scene, they can apply their manipulations in individual Photoportal versions, compare their proposals and enter the one they agree on. [16] • Explicit notifications [10,16] • Input merging [8,35,36,34] • Territoriality [16,38,43,24,42,29,39] • Complementary input [6] • Extended field of view [20] • Show Through [2] • Specialized views [1] • Shared control [26] • Augmented group navigation [26] • Shared WIM [5] Novel Strategies for Collaboration Support as Provided by Reference-Based Interaction with Photoportals Secondary scene representations reduce demand for object manipulation.…”

Section: Design Challenges Of Collaborative Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Geometric features may be hidden behind other geometry from several perspectives. Argelaguet et al suggested tackling this problem with cut-away visualizations that let indicated features show through occluding parts of the shared scene [2]. Note that both techniques imply a distorted perception of the scene which can be highly detrimental, e.g.…”

Section: Design Challenges Of Collaborative Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Photoportals

Kunert

Kulik

Beck

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &Amp; Social Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Figure 1. Collaborative interaction with Photoportals. Left: A user takes a virtual photo of a local and two remote collaborators in a virtual city model. Note that the local user (standing on the left) also appears in the virtual photo. Right: Two local users (on the left side) share a box-shaped Photoportal with two remote collaborators (on the right side). A remote user operates a virtual pointer inside the portal to manipulate the ship model in the background at a convenient scale and distance while the other users provide guidance from their individual viewpoints. ABSTRACTPhotoportals build on digital photography as a unifying metaphor for reference-based interaction in 3D virtual environments. Virtual photos and videos serve as threedimensional references to objects, places, moments in time and activities of users. Our Photoportals also provide access to intermediate or alternative versions of a scenario and allow the review of recorded task sequences that include life-size representations of the captured users.We propose to exploit such references to structure collaborative activities of collocated and remote users. Photoportals offer additional access points for multiple users and encourage mutual support through the preparation and provision of references for manipulation and navigation tasks. They support the pattern of territoriality with configurable space representations that can be used for private interaction, as well as be shared and exchanged with others.

show abstract

See-through techniques for referential awareness in collaborative virtual reality

Cited by 43 publications

References 23 publications

Proposing the control‐reactance compliance model (CRCM) to explain opposing motivations to comply with organisational information security policies

Proposing the control‐reactance compliance model (CRCM) to explain opposing motivations to comply with organisational information security policies

4D Site Installation Planning in Virtual Reality for Multi-user

Photoportals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About