1995
DOI: 10.1109/23.489245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEE rate calculations using the effective flux approach and a generalized figure of merit approximation

Abstract: This paper explains the inconsistencies reported between effective flux calculations and integral rectangular parallelepiped calculations. The two types of calculation yield consistent results when the effective flux calculation is performed allowing for the appropriate geometry. A set of generic heavy ion cross section curves is introduced so that upset rate calculations can be compared as a function of device area and threshold.The figure of merit approximation is generalized so that it can be used for any o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the GCR model in CREME96 gives a much improved description of the solar cycle variation in GCR intensity, Figure 2 suggests that changes in the solar minimum environment per se are relatively small. This is confirmed in Figure 3, which shows calculated SEU rates3 behind 100 mils A1 shielding in geosynchronous orbit for a set of representative devices [13]. These devices were chosen to represent a wide range of thresholds, device dimensions, and technologies.…”
Section: Creme96mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the GCR model in CREME96 gives a much improved description of the solar cycle variation in GCR intensity, Figure 2 suggests that changes in the solar minimum environment per se are relatively small. This is confirmed in Figure 3, which shows calculated SEU rates3 behind 100 mils A1 shielding in geosynchronous orbit for a set of representative devices [13]. These devices were chosen to represent a wide range of thresholds, device dimensions, and technologies.…”
Section: Creme96mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To demonstrate this, Figure 5 shows SEU rates behind 100 mils A1 shielding in 28.5O, 450 km orbit for the set of representative devices [13]. In low-threshold devices, where relativistic Galactic cosmic rays dominate, the SEU rates are unchanged.…”
Section: A "Worst-case" Particle Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RPP method is also available in the commercial software packages, NOVICE [19] and Space Radiation [20]. This modified FoM is presented in other and perhaps more convenient forms in [29]. In [111] Petersen discusses its applicability to many practical situations.…”
Section: Rectangular Parallelepiped Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also see [28], [29], [88], [120], [121], [123], [124], [125], [126] and [128] 3.6 Proton-and Neutron-Induced SEEs…”
Section: Irpp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation