1947
DOI: 10.2307/807796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

See America First

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were, in turn: 'The Peculiarities of the English' (hereafter Peculiarities) directed at the leading figures of the younger New Left generation: 'An Open Letter to Leszek Kolakowski' (hereafter Open Letter) which provided a public reprimand of this, formerly Marxist, Polish philosopher; and 'The Poverty of Theory' (hereafter The Poverty) which lampooned the avatar of Marxist structuralism, French philosopher Louis Althusser. 12 Despite some notable differences-Peculiarities involved an extended historical discussion of the deficiencies of his opponents' ideas, while the others reflected the philosophical inclinations of his selected opponents-these works were intimately related to one another in that they offered an overlapping and evolving set of reflections on Thompson's own, ambivalent relationship with the lineage of English social criticism. He also began to develop in these pieces an extended set of reflections on the importance and distinctiveness of historical forms of understanding.…”
Section: Michael Kennymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These were, in turn: 'The Peculiarities of the English' (hereafter Peculiarities) directed at the leading figures of the younger New Left generation: 'An Open Letter to Leszek Kolakowski' (hereafter Open Letter) which provided a public reprimand of this, formerly Marxist, Polish philosopher; and 'The Poverty of Theory' (hereafter The Poverty) which lampooned the avatar of Marxist structuralism, French philosopher Louis Althusser. 12 Despite some notable differences-Peculiarities involved an extended historical discussion of the deficiencies of his opponents' ideas, while the others reflected the philosophical inclinations of his selected opponents-these works were intimately related to one another in that they offered an overlapping and evolving set of reflections on Thompson's own, ambivalent relationship with the lineage of English social criticism. He also began to develop in these pieces an extended set of reflections on the importance and distinctiveness of historical forms of understanding.…”
Section: Michael Kennymentioning
confidence: 97%