Seduced by Technology? How moral agency is mediated by the invisibility of everyday technologies

Abstract

We introduce postphenomenology to organization studies to address the question: How is moral agency mediated through everyday technologies? Drawing on our everyday experiences of academic knowledge production as an empirical illustration, we argue that the extent to which technological mediations are visible and invisible has important implications for moral agency. We conceptualize the visibilities of technological mediations through two dimensions: (1) visibilities of the source of mediation, and (2) visibilities of the connection between the means of mediation and its effects. Using these dimensions, we differentiate four different modes of mediation – coercive, persuasive, decisive and seductive – each varying in terms of moral agency. We problematize the invisibility of technological mediations, as evinced by a condition we term seductive mediation where both the sources of mediation and the means of mediation are invisible, then conclude with specific implications for organization studies.

Openness as Organizing Principle: Introduction to the Special Issue

“…However, organizational inclusion efforts often do not acknowledge diversity when selecting individuals for participation or recognize minority views when selecting strategic issues ( Dobusch et al, 2019 ). These failures in adhering to equal opportunities are often fostered by technological mediations ( Greenwood & Wolfram Cox, 2022 ). Motivated by beliefs in democracy, promoters of open education argue for more collaborative and cooperative forms of educating people and conducting research ( Peters, 2008 ).…”

On the psycho-emotional deficitisation of workers in the age of cognitive enhancement

“…Technological mediations have been defined as ‘ways in which technologies co-shape, enable, challenge or change the engagement of people with the world’ (de Boer et al, 2018: 302). When humans and technologies are not easily distinguishable, they can work together and produce something new (Greenwood and Wolfram Cox, 2022), including new subjects (i.e. individuals with affective deficits) and objects (i.e.…”

Theory‐Driven Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business and Management

“…As such, we cannot rely on conventional attributions of authority and responsibility (Coekebergh and Gunkel, 2023). Understanding AI technologies as ‘implicated in new regimes of verification, new forms of identifying a wrong or of truth telling in the world’ and, thus, embedded with political arrangements and value propositions about the world (Amoore, 2020, p. 6), the task of determining responsible practice becomes one of ethical reflection and democratic discussion (Coekebergh and Gunkel, 2023; Greenwood and Wolfram Cox, 2023).…”