2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1611.10252
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SeDMiD for Confusion Detection: Uncovering Mind State from Time Series Brain Wave Data

Abstract: Understanding how brain functions has been an intriguing topic for years. With the recent progress on collecting massive data and developing advanced technology, people have become interested in addressing the challenge of decoding brain wave data into meaningful mind states, with many machine learning models and algorithms being revisited and developed, especially the ones that handle time series data because of the nature of brain waves. However, many of these time series models, like HMM with hidden state i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to Wang et al, Bousmalis et al developed an approach based on a hidden conditional random field algorithm that, through the combination of verbal and nonverbal cues, achieved a combined accuracy of 64.2% for dis-/agreement detection [5]. The detection of confusion is primarily focused on EEG-based data [32,45,49] or based on natural language processing with text input [17,47]. Using automatically recognized Action Units from the Facial Action Coding System, Borges et al trained an LSTM neural network on their own collected data, with which they reported an F1-score of 80.89% for their confusion class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to Wang et al, Bousmalis et al developed an approach based on a hidden conditional random field algorithm that, through the combination of verbal and nonverbal cues, achieved a combined accuracy of 64.2% for dis-/agreement detection [5]. The detection of confusion is primarily focused on EEG-based data [32,45,49] or based on natural language processing with text input [17,47]. Using automatically recognized Action Units from the Facial Action Coding System, Borges et al trained an LSTM neural network on their own collected data, with which they reported an F1-score of 80.89% for their confusion class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%