SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1996 1996
DOI: 10.1190/1.1826475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediments with gas hydrates: Internal structure from seismic AVO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The water‐saturated bulk and shear moduli are calculated using the Gassmann [1951] equation. The bulk and shear moduli of the dry frame of sediments without gas hydrate can be calculated from the modified Hashin‐Shtrikman‐Hertz‐Mindlin theory [ Dvorkin et al , 1999; Ecker et al , 1998]. To estimate gas hydrate saturation, it is assumed gas hydrate is part of the dry sediment matrix and will reduce the porosity of the matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water‐saturated bulk and shear moduli are calculated using the Gassmann [1951] equation. The bulk and shear moduli of the dry frame of sediments without gas hydrate can be calculated from the modified Hashin‐Shtrikman‐Hertz‐Mindlin theory [ Dvorkin et al , 1999; Ecker et al , 1998]. To estimate gas hydrate saturation, it is assumed gas hydrate is part of the dry sediment matrix and will reduce the porosity of the matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from the OBC line in the Storegga area may indicate that a noncementation model should be applied to estimate the hydrate concentration of sediments at the base of the gas hydrate stability zone along this line. The equations suggested by Ecker et al [1998] and Dvorkin et al [2000] are used to tentatively estimate the concentration of free gas and of gas hydrate from a noncementing gas hydrate model. We assume in the modeling, for simplicity, and due to lack of petrophysical information from the study area, a sediment with 60% porosity, and a pore space with 75% clay and 25% sand (quartz).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both theoretical and experimental rock physics modeling suggest that the effect of gas hydrate on physical properties of shallow unconsolidated sediment will depend on the microscale gas hydrate distribution within the sediment pores. If gas hydrate is located at grain contacts, it will act as a load‐bearing component of the dry frame to strongly increase the stiffness of the sediment, and even small amounts of hydrate will according Dvorkin and Nur [1993] and Ecker et al [1998] cause a drastic increase in both V p and V s . Gas hydrate which is located away from grain contacts as a part of the sediment pore fluid will not affect the stiffness of the dry frame, and will cause a more evenly, but not as dramatic increase in V p and practically no change in V s .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of theoretical models or experimental models have been proposed to estimate gas hydrate saturation, such as Wyllie et al [15] time average equation with the seismic velocity [1618], the effective medium theory [1923], Biot-Gassmann theory model [2427], compression wave (P wave) velocity of thermal-elastic theory [28], the three-phase equation (TPE) [2934], and velocity model theory based on the two-phase theory (TPT) model [35]. Moreover, Tinivella et al [36] made a research to compare the TPT model with the TPE model for evaluating gas hydrate saturations in marine sediments, and the comparison showed that the two theoretical approaches were in very good agreement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%