Fluvial Meanders and Their Sedimentary Products in the Rock Record 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119424437.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentology of meandering river deposits: advances and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, correlations between planform evolution (i.e. scroll‐bar pattern) and related point‐bar geometries were carried out for fluvial meanders (Pranter et al ., 2007; Ghinassi et al ., 2013, 2014; Ielpi & Ghinassi, 2014; Ghinassi & Ielpi, 2015; Yan et al ., 2017, 2019; Willis & Sech, 2018a; Ghinassi et al ., 2019a; Parquer et al ., 2019) along with models concerning along‐bend grain‐size distribution (Purkait, 2002; Frings, 2008; Smith et al ., 2009, 2011; Bhattacharyya & Bhattacharya, 2015; Ghinassi & Ielpi, 2015; Clift et al ., 2019; Hagstrom et al ., 2019). Comparable insights are conversely missing for intertidal meanders, whose planform evolution has been inferred only for short time intervals (Choi et al ., 2013; Ghinassi et al ., 2018b) and for which the spatial distribution of sediment grain size was mainly investigated with vertical, rather than along‐channel, trends (de Mowbray, 1983; Dalrymple et al ., 1990; Pearson & Gingras, 2006; Choi, 2011; Choi et al ., 2013; Choi & Jo, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, correlations between planform evolution (i.e. scroll‐bar pattern) and related point‐bar geometries were carried out for fluvial meanders (Pranter et al ., 2007; Ghinassi et al ., 2013, 2014; Ielpi & Ghinassi, 2014; Ghinassi & Ielpi, 2015; Yan et al ., 2017, 2019; Willis & Sech, 2018a; Ghinassi et al ., 2019a; Parquer et al ., 2019) along with models concerning along‐bend grain‐size distribution (Purkait, 2002; Frings, 2008; Smith et al ., 2009, 2011; Bhattacharyya & Bhattacharya, 2015; Ghinassi & Ielpi, 2015; Clift et al ., 2019; Hagstrom et al ., 2019). Comparable insights are conversely missing for intertidal meanders, whose planform evolution has been inferred only for short time intervals (Choi et al ., 2013; Ghinassi et al ., 2018b) and for which the spatial distribution of sediment grain size was mainly investigated with vertical, rather than along‐channel, trends (de Mowbray, 1983; Dalrymple et al ., 1990; Pearson & Gingras, 2006; Choi, 2011; Choi et al ., 2013; Choi & Jo, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it provides an approach that extracts the greatest amount of information from limited data sets, allowing the evolution of ancient channels to be reconstructed. Hence, this approach could be applied to palaeochannel reconstruction of outcrop analogues, using information on river channel migration, spatio‐temporal variation of point bar geometry and facies, and outcrop orientation (Ghinassi et al, 2018; Willis, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reveal the meander‐bend planform evolution of subsurface fluvial successions, it is important to identify migration patterns in well‐to‐well cross‐sections. The relationship between the channel planform evolution of MMRs and the subsurface reservoir architecture of AMRs has been discussed in many previous studies (Ghinassi et al, 2014, 2018; Ielpi & Ghinassi, 2014; Lin et al, 2018b; Shan et al, 2018a). The fundamental relationship between morphological evolution and the internal architecture of meandering river deposits is indicated in the change in dip azimuth and angle of inclined beds, including the first‐order to fourth‐order bounding surfaces (Figure 3).…”
Section: Meander‐bend Migration Patternsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation