2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.03240
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentation of random suspensions and the effect of hyperuniformity

Abstract: This work is concerned with the mathematical analysis of the bulk rheology of random suspensions of rigid particles settling under gravity in viscous fluids. Each particle generates a fluid flow that in turn acts on other particles and hinders their settling. In an equilibrium perspective, for a given ensemble of particle positions, we analyze both the associated mean settling speed and the velocity fluctuations of individual particles. In the 1970s, Batchelor gave a proper definition of the mean settling spee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(133 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our setting is not restricted to the random deletion case, as g k is allowed to depend on φ (and is even fully arbitrary for k ≥ 6). It is neither covered by [11,Theorem 7]: the mixing conditions that we use, expressed through the asymptotic behaviour of the first correlation functions of the process, seem a bit weaker than the α-mixing used there. Furthermore, the general bounds given in [11,Theorem 7] would only imply in our context µ 2 = O(| log φ|), to be compared to the optimal bound µ 2 = O(1) in Proposition 2.2.…”
Section: Theorem 23 (Derivation Of Batchelor-green Formula)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, our setting is not restricted to the random deletion case, as g k is allowed to depend on φ (and is even fully arbitrary for k ≥ 6). It is neither covered by [11,Theorem 7]: the mixing conditions that we use, expressed through the asymptotic behaviour of the first correlation functions of the process, seem a bit weaker than the α-mixing used there. Furthermore, the general bounds given in [11,Theorem 7] would only imply in our context µ 2 = O(| log φ|), to be compared to the optimal bound µ 2 = O(1) in Proposition 2.2.…”
Section: Theorem 23 (Derivation Of Batchelor-green Formula)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such result has been known for long in the context of the Laplace equation [25, chapter 3], to our knowledge, the Stokes case was only analyzed in the recent paper [9]. See [5,2,14,7,18,11] for other stochastic homogenization results in fluid mechanics. In [9], the authors consider a stationary and ergodic point process (x i ) i∈N over R 3 , and B i,ε := εB i , where B i := B(x i , 1) is the closed unit ball centered at x i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since energy is then pumped into the system, naïve energy estimates blow up, and the analysis crucially relies on stochastic cancellations. Annealed L p regularity in form of Theorem 5 below constitutes the main technical input in [15] for our analysis of this sedimentation problem. More precisely, in a general non-dilute regime, this allows us to obtain the first rigorous proof of the celebrated predictions by Batchelor [9] and by Caflisch and Luke [11] on the effective sedimentation speed and on individual velocity fluctuations, thus significantly extending the perturbative results of [24] (see also [32]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also mention the useful reformulation in form of annealed regularity in [19]. Based on these ideas, we develop corresponding quenched large-scale and annealed regularity theories for the steady Stokes problem (2.5), which constitute the key technical ingredient in our work [15] on sedimentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation