1997
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1997.2271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentation Field-Flow Fractionation of Cellular Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] For these purposes, conventional flowassisted separation techniques and their microfabricated counterparts have been developed, such as field flow fractionation (FFF) and split-flow thin fractionation (SF). [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Among the various FFF methods, sedimentation FFF (SdFFF), gravitational FFF (GrFFF), and their combination method with dielectrophoresis (DEP-FFF) were mainly used for applications of micron-sized particles, providing biocompatible and sterilized protocols. [5][6][7][8][9][10] However, particle separation in GrFFF and DEP-FFF is not conducted in a continuous manner, which gives some disadvantages of both restricted amounts of samples within separation chamber volumes and relatively long separation times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3] For these purposes, conventional flowassisted separation techniques and their microfabricated counterparts have been developed, such as field flow fractionation (FFF) and split-flow thin fractionation (SF). [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Among the various FFF methods, sedimentation FFF (SdFFF), gravitational FFF (GrFFF), and their combination method with dielectrophoresis (DEP-FFF) were mainly used for applications of micron-sized particles, providing biocompatible and sterilized protocols. [5][6][7][8][9][10] However, particle separation in GrFFF and DEP-FFF is not conducted in a continuous manner, which gives some disadvantages of both restricted amounts of samples within separation chamber volumes and relatively long separation times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Among the various FFF methods, sedimentation FFF (SdFFF), gravitational FFF (GrFFF), and their combination method with dielectrophoresis (DEP-FFF) were mainly used for applications of micron-sized particles, providing biocompatible and sterilized protocols. [5][6][7][8][9][10] However, particle separation in GrFFF and DEP-FFF is not conducted in a continuous manner, which gives some disadvantages of both restricted amounts of samples within separation chamber volumes and relatively long separation times. [7][8][9][10] SF, one of the continuous fractionation methods, was applied to separation of human blood cells using centrifugal and magnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parts a and b of Figure 2 show that, whatever the type of particle and ∆T, R increases steadily with increasing carrier flow rate. This kind of behavior is typical of that observed for retention of micrometer-sized particles in sedimentation FFF, either gravitational or centrifugal, 34,35,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] and implicitly in symmetrical flow FFF channels. 60 This behavior has been interpreted as a result of the lift mechanism of retention in FFF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…7,8 Sedimentation field-flow fractionation is a powerful technique for the fractionation and characterization of particles and colloids in environmental and biological samples. 5,9,10 For environmental samples, colloidal particles in river water, 11 colloidal aggregates, 12 soil particles, 13 and airborne samples [5][6][7][8]14,15 were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%