2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2017.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentary and evolutionary characteristics of Sinian in the Tarim Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sporadically interbedded medium-to thick-bedded conglomerates, characterized by poor sorting and well-rounded clasts (Figure 2e), may signify deltaic plain channel deposition. Consequently, the overall features of the Clastic Member display a notable resemblance to the lithological composition and depositional environments described by [12,28] for the Yukengou Formation in the central Kuruktag area. These features contrast significantly with the lithology of the Beisainaertage Formation, which consists of phyllite, foliated sandstone, and quartzite, as reported in [29].…”
Section: Geological Setting and Stratigraphic Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sporadically interbedded medium-to thick-bedded conglomerates, characterized by poor sorting and well-rounded clasts (Figure 2e), may signify deltaic plain channel deposition. Consequently, the overall features of the Clastic Member display a notable resemblance to the lithological composition and depositional environments described by [12,28] for the Yukengou Formation in the central Kuruktag area. These features contrast significantly with the lithology of the Beisainaertage Formation, which consists of phyllite, foliated sandstone, and quartzite, as reported in [29].…”
Section: Geological Setting and Stratigraphic Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Nevertheless, due to restricted accessibility for comprehensive research in the central Kuruktag block, where the majority of previously reported Cryogenian-Ediacaran strata were exposed (Figure 1b), their depositional setting remains a contentious subject. Numerous scholars suggest that the strata were deposited in a continental rift-passive margin or continental rift-aulacogen basin [2,4,[9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, recent investigations, leveraging structural-sedimentary patterns and contemporaneous magmatism, propose that the Cryogenian-Ediacaran strata might have been deposited in a subduction environment on the supercontinent's periphery, signifying active rift sedimentation [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time of rapid subsidence in the Tarim Basin corresponds to the highest paleoheat flow and the rapid rise of paleogeotemperature during the Cambrian (He et al, 2017). The significant increases in the thickness of the mudstones and siltstones in the lower Cambrian in the vicinity of Well XH1 in the northern part of the basin indicate that the water depth was increasing at this time (Shi et al, 2017;Wen et al, 2017;Figure 4). During this period, the widespread transgressions formed the continental deposits along the slope of the paleotopography.…”
Section: Relations Of Onlap and Yuertusi Source Rockmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The differences in the sedimentary environments between the southern and northern parts of the Tarim Basin of the Upper Sinian gradually decrease with decreasing age. A carbonate-rich continental shelf facies is present in the northern Tarim Basin, whereas a dolomite tidal flat facies is present in the southern Tarim Basin (Feng et al, 2015;Shi et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019). Previous scholars have used the U-Pb zircon age to determine the ages of the Nanhua-Sinian strata in the wells of the Tarim Basin.…”
Section: Nanhua-cambrian Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stratigraphic features of Tazhong Uplift shows that a large number of marine sedimentation strata developed after multi-stage tectonic movements [15][16][17]; however the majority of existing strata belong to Paleozoic and the minority to Meso-Cenozoic. Unconformity interfaces presented among the different formations in the stratigraphic column and the Base Silurian is the most important one.…”
Section: Stratigraphic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%