2005
DOI: 10.3133/sir20055234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment-transport investigations of the Upper Yellowstone River, Montana, 1999 through 2001: data collection, analysis, and simulation of sediment transport

Abstract: Boxplots showing variation of average simulated channel degradation at simulated peak discharge and average simulated channel aggradation at end of simulation period at 40 cross sections for the 2-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year synthetic-flood hydrographs,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[]; 3 = Jones and Seitz []; 4 = Ryan and Emmett []; 5 = Hortness and Berenbrock []; 6 = Clark and Woods []; 7 = Williams and Krupin []; 8 = USGS National Water Information System accessed between 1/2008 and 7/2011; 9 = determined from field measurements by the authors; 10 = Berenbrock and Tranmer []; 11 = Kondolf et al . []; 12 = bankfull discharge estimated from a regional relationship as Q = a DA b , where Q is discharge, DA is drainage area, and a and b are empirical power law parameters; 13 = Miller []; 14 = Holnbeck []; 15 = Curran et al . []; 16 = Williams and Rosgen []; 17 = Ryan []; 18 = Thompson []; and 19 = Emmett et al .…”
Section: Study Area and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[]; 3 = Jones and Seitz []; 4 = Ryan and Emmett []; 5 = Hortness and Berenbrock []; 6 = Clark and Woods []; 7 = Williams and Krupin []; 8 = USGS National Water Information System accessed between 1/2008 and 7/2011; 9 = determined from field measurements by the authors; 10 = Berenbrock and Tranmer []; 11 = Kondolf et al . []; 12 = bankfull discharge estimated from a regional relationship as Q = a DA b , where Q is discharge, DA is drainage area, and a and b are empirical power law parameters; 13 = Miller []; 14 = Holnbeck []; 15 = Curran et al . []; 16 = Williams and Rosgen []; 17 = Ryan []; 18 = Thompson []; and 19 = Emmett et al .…”
Section: Study Area and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bed load measurements were made using an Equal Width Increment (EWI) approach and a Helley‐Smith sampler with a 7.6 × 7.6 cm orifice in most cases (e.g., King et al . []); larger Toutle River (15.2 × 30.5 cm) and Elwha (10 × 20 cm) samplers were used at five sites [ Holnbeck , ; Erwin et al ., ; this study]. Suspended sediment sampling followed width and depth integrated sampling protocols [ Edwards and Glysson , ; King et al ., ], although rarely dip samples were reported for some of the data sets in the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not specifically assessed herein, spawning habitat in the upstream reaches of the Yellowstone River appears to be suitable, with relatively low gradients (Lawrence et al. 2012), an abundance of gravel substrate, and shallow, calm, clear water (Orth and Newcomb 2002; Dalby and Robinson 2003; Holnbeck 2005). Alternatively, the spatial disconnect between juvenile and adult distributions may be caused by a temporal mismatch in upstream dispersal versus spawning temperature cues (Rubenson and Olden 2016) or density dependence, a major driver of animal dispersal (Marchetti et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%