Marine Ecotoxicology 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803371-5.00007-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment Toxicity Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PFOS level was surprisingly much lower in benthic biota than in most pelagic biota, which was contradicted to literature findings that benthic biota tended to contain higher levels of PFAAs . This might be because benthic biota fed on all kinds of small particles near the sediment layer and was at a lower trophic level than pelagic fish, which reduced the magnitude of biomagnification. Also, the high standard deviations showed large variance in measurements and a more comprehensive study was needed to reach a certain conclusion.”…”
Section: Results and Learning Outcomescontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…PFOS level was surprisingly much lower in benthic biota than in most pelagic biota, which was contradicted to literature findings that benthic biota tended to contain higher levels of PFAAs . This might be because benthic biota fed on all kinds of small particles near the sediment layer and was at a lower trophic level than pelagic fish, which reduced the magnitude of biomagnification. Also, the high standard deviations showed large variance in measurements and a more comprehensive study was needed to reach a certain conclusion.”…”
Section: Results and Learning Outcomescontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Sediment toxicity tests are widely accepted tools to assess the chemical pollution of environmental sediment samples and to measure the toxicity of chemicals added to natural or artificial sediments . Both endo- and epibenthic test organisms like copepods, amphipods, bivalves, and polychaetes are used for toxicity assessments, most requiring a manual or (semi)­automated water exchange system to supply oxygen and to remove toxic byproducts for a typical test duration of 10–28 days. However, it has been observed that differences between test setups and protocols can lead to substantial alterations in chemical bioavailability, emphasizing the need for methods to quantify and understand exposure for better interpretation of laboratory toxicity and extrapolation to field exposure conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional approaches to directly assess metal bioavailability in sediments have relied heavily upon long-term bioaccumulation , and toxicity tests. ,, The former approach intends to quantify the bioavailability by comparing the tissue metal concentrations before and after the sediment exposure, while the latter approach indirectly derives the bioavailability relying on the metal exposure–toxicity relationship. Both approaches require long-term contaminant exposure to accumulate detectable and reliable changes in metal concentrations or for the toxic effects to manifest and are also challenged by the ability to replicate field conditions. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%