“…The metamorphic rocks have been thrust over Oligocene to Miocene volcano-sedimentary rocks along the NW-SE Qeynarj-e-Chartagh thrust fault (Figure 2), but they are overlained unconformably by Tertiary rocks in the east of the area (Babakhani and Ghalamghash, 1990). K-Ar dating of carbonaceous schists in the Zarshuran area (Mehrabi et al, 1999), apatite U-Th/He data from the Mahneshan area (Stockli et al, 2004), and 40 Ar-39 Ar dating of muscovite schists (Gilg et al, 2006), constrains the timing of rapid exhumation of the basement rocks to the Early Miocene (20 Ma). The U-Pb zircon intrusion age of the granitic gneisses in the Mahneshan metamorphic complex $560 Ma (Stockli et al, 2004) is similar to U-Pb dates from basement rocks of the Saghand area from the Central Iran Zone (Ramezani and Tucker, 2003).…”
The Mahneshan granitoids intruded the Neoproterozoic-Lower Cambrian regional metamorphic rocks in northwestern Iran. These granitoids consisting mainly of K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, muscovite, garnet and biotite display a number of subtypes in terms of structure, texture and mineralogy. Geochemically, they are peraluminous and (or) slightly peraluminous with variable normative corundum contents (0.28-4.50%), and medium to high potassic with calc-alkaline affinity. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns indicate that these granitoids can be divided into three distinct groups, supported by petrographic data. The REE patterns of the first group are shallow-sloping in LREE relative to HREE ([La/Yb]n ¼ 1.37-2.48), exhibiting pronounced negative Eu (Eu/Eu à ¼ 0.23-0.35). The second group granitoids are characterized by strong LREE-enrichment relative to HREE ([La/Yb]n ¼ 3-6.20), with positive Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu à ¼ 1.15-1.47). The third group of granitoids is depleted in the middle REE relative to other LREE and HREE. These REE patterns suggest the role of plagioclase and hornblende in their source of granitoids for group 1 and groups 2 and 3, respectively. The trends of Eu/Eu à ratio versus silica contents suggest mixing of mafic material with components formed by crustal melting with a plagioclase-rich residue. Furthermore, thermobarometric estimations indicate that these rocks may have been formed at depths of 15-18 km at relatively low temperatures. The Mahneshan granitoids are S-type and may have been emplaced in a syn-to post-collisional tectonic setting, consistent with an origin of water-saturated magmas with heterogeneous composition derived from different crustal rocks.
“…The metamorphic rocks have been thrust over Oligocene to Miocene volcano-sedimentary rocks along the NW-SE Qeynarj-e-Chartagh thrust fault (Figure 2), but they are overlained unconformably by Tertiary rocks in the east of the area (Babakhani and Ghalamghash, 1990). K-Ar dating of carbonaceous schists in the Zarshuran area (Mehrabi et al, 1999), apatite U-Th/He data from the Mahneshan area (Stockli et al, 2004), and 40 Ar-39 Ar dating of muscovite schists (Gilg et al, 2006), constrains the timing of rapid exhumation of the basement rocks to the Early Miocene (20 Ma). The U-Pb zircon intrusion age of the granitic gneisses in the Mahneshan metamorphic complex $560 Ma (Stockli et al, 2004) is similar to U-Pb dates from basement rocks of the Saghand area from the Central Iran Zone (Ramezani and Tucker, 2003).…”
The Mahneshan granitoids intruded the Neoproterozoic-Lower Cambrian regional metamorphic rocks in northwestern Iran. These granitoids consisting mainly of K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, muscovite, garnet and biotite display a number of subtypes in terms of structure, texture and mineralogy. Geochemically, they are peraluminous and (or) slightly peraluminous with variable normative corundum contents (0.28-4.50%), and medium to high potassic with calc-alkaline affinity. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns indicate that these granitoids can be divided into three distinct groups, supported by petrographic data. The REE patterns of the first group are shallow-sloping in LREE relative to HREE ([La/Yb]n ¼ 1.37-2.48), exhibiting pronounced negative Eu (Eu/Eu à ¼ 0.23-0.35). The second group granitoids are characterized by strong LREE-enrichment relative to HREE ([La/Yb]n ¼ 3-6.20), with positive Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu à ¼ 1.15-1.47). The third group of granitoids is depleted in the middle REE relative to other LREE and HREE. These REE patterns suggest the role of plagioclase and hornblende in their source of granitoids for group 1 and groups 2 and 3, respectively. The trends of Eu/Eu à ratio versus silica contents suggest mixing of mafic material with components formed by crustal melting with a plagioclase-rich residue. Furthermore, thermobarometric estimations indicate that these rocks may have been formed at depths of 15-18 km at relatively low temperatures. The Mahneshan granitoids are S-type and may have been emplaced in a syn-to post-collisional tectonic setting, consistent with an origin of water-saturated magmas with heterogeneous composition derived from different crustal rocks.
“…Recent studies indicate the probable existence of porphyry type mineralization in the Hashtrud-Mianeh region accompanying Oligocene plutonism that intruded the Eocene volcanic rocks (Jamali, 2011;unpublished data). Miocene magmatism with an adakitic signature and mildly alkaline affinity is accompanied with epithermal and Carlin type gold mineralization in Ghorveh and Takab regions (Mehrabi et al, 1999;Richards, 2006 and2009).…”
“…In some cases, stable isotope analyses, outcrop characteristics, radiometric dating, and mineral overgrowths may be used to decipher the origins and age relationships between minerals (e.g. Faure and Brathwaite, 2006;Mehrabi, Yardley and Cann, 1999;Zachariás et al, 2004;Sidle, Wotten and Murphy, 2001;Sidle, 2002;. Specifically, the Getchell hydrothermal gold deposits in north-central Nevada, USA, contain arsenopyrite, arsenian pyrite, orpiment, and realgar Cline, 2001).…”
Section: Arsenic Mineralogy Of Hydrothermal Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural stibnite may contain more than 0.5 wt% of arsenic (Ashley et al, 2003). Other arsenic-bearing minerals that may be present in hydrothermal deposits include: orpiment, realgar, nickeline (NiAs), loellingite (FeAs 2 ), tennantite ((Cu,Fe) 12 As 4 S 13 ), and arsenolite (As 2 O 3 ) (Pfeifer et al, 2004, 207;Craig, Vaughan and Skinner, 2001, 353;Mandal and Suzuki, 2002;Van Moort, Hotchkis and Pwa, 1995;Mehrabi, Yardley and Cann, 1999).…”
Section: Arsenic Mineralogy Of Hydrothermal Depositsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.