2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment erosion in guide vanes of Francis turbine: A case study of Kaligandaki Hydropower Plant, Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results depict that velocity difference between particle and water is not large in the flow passage of Francis turbine. This agrees well with the previous studies of liquid-solid two-phase flow performed with fine particles [9,26]. Near the runner blade, the velocity of solid phase is slower than that of liquid phase.…”
Section: Flow Prediction For Solid Phasesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results depict that velocity difference between particle and water is not large in the flow passage of Francis turbine. This agrees well with the previous studies of liquid-solid two-phase flow performed with fine particles [9,26]. Near the runner blade, the velocity of solid phase is slower than that of liquid phase.…”
Section: Flow Prediction For Solid Phasesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This can be severe in the context of hydropower plant operating with very high sediment concentration in Nepal. It was reported that size of clearance gap was around 10 mm at some locations of Kaligandaki 'A' hydropower plant Nepal, due to sediment erosion (Koirala, Thapa, Neopane, Zhu and Chhetry, 2016). In a similar study, erosion depth up to 35 mm at some locations of GV of Bhilangana HPP, India was observed (Acharya et al, 2019.…”
Section: Ctpmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The increase in the size of clearance gap due to erosive wear reduces the overall efficiency of the turbine Koirala, Thapa, Neopane, Zhu and Chhetry, 2016). Figure 2 shows the efficiency measurement of Francis turbine with different size of clearance gaps.…”
Section: Ctpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the influence of end-clearance on turbine efficiency was studied, where the loss in efficiency is greater than the increase of leakage flow. Koirala [16] showed that high quartz content, inefficiency of the flushing system, higher concentration of sediment load, high impingement velocity, and operation at low guide vane angles were the major contributors to sediment erosion in guide vanes. The end-surface clearance flow of the turbine guide vane was simplified as circular-cylinder flow and backward-facing step flow by Han [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%