2005
DOI: 10.1080/14634980590914935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment and heavy metal accumulation in a small canal, Venice, Italy

Abstract: Sediment and heavy metal accumulation in a small canal, Sediment and heavy metal accumulation were studied in a canal of Venice (Rio di S.Angelo) that has typical characteristics of medium-to-small canals with respect to dimensions, boat traffic and pollution sources. The tidal dynamics are particularly weak in this ∼5 m wide canal. Four cores were collected across a section and five additional cores were collected from the longitudinal axis. The canal was dredged in the late 1950s, and therefore the collected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit between L1 and L2, based on change in metal concentrations, cannot be precisely determined and the date of reopening of the canals after dredging is not precisely known (sometime between 2003 and 2004). Consequently, the estimated sedimentation rate of recent sediment in L1 is approximate but consistent with previous estimates for the Venice canals of about 2-3 cm year −1 [30,31]. As the dredging in the studied canals was finalized at latest in 2004, followed by the overflow from adjacent canal sections, we assumed that normal sedimentation resumed in 2005.…”
Section: Sediment Characteristics Along the Vertical Profilesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limit between L1 and L2, based on change in metal concentrations, cannot be precisely determined and the date of reopening of the canals after dredging is not precisely known (sometime between 2003 and 2004). Consequently, the estimated sedimentation rate of recent sediment in L1 is approximate but consistent with previous estimates for the Venice canals of about 2-3 cm year −1 [30,31]. As the dredging in the studied canals was finalized at latest in 2004, followed by the overflow from adjacent canal sections, we assumed that normal sedimentation resumed in 2005.…”
Section: Sediment Characteristics Along the Vertical Profilesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More sediment accumulates at the edges of the canals than in the central part. Cores were collected at a distance of 1-1.5 m from the canal walls, corresponding to about a quarter of the canal width, which should ideally reflect the average sediment accumulation rate at each site [31]. In addition, the surface of the canal bottom was uneven after the excavation, and boat traffic and the location of domestic sewage discharge points can produce small undulations, resulting in a variable accumulation rate in the longitudinal direction of the canal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surrounding land has little, if any, relief. The lagoon's drainage basin covers 1850 km 2 and has an annual average rainfall of 950 mm (Zonta et al 2005). Previous measurements of SGD in this lagoon average 30 cm d 21 in the northern lagoon and 6 cm d 21 in the central lagoon (Rapaglia 2005;Garcia-Solsona et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%