2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEDIGISM-ATLASGAL: dense gas fraction and star formation efficiency across the Galactic disc

Abstract: By combining two surveys covering a large fraction of the molecular material in the Galactic disk we investigate the role the spiral arms play in the star formation process. We have matched clumps identified by ATLASGAL with their parental GMCs as identified by SEDIGISM, and use these giant molecular cloud (GMC) masses, the bolometric luminosities, and integrated clump masses obtained in a concurrent paper to estimate the dense gas fractions (DGFgmc = ∑Mclump/Mgmc) and the instantaneous star forming efficienci… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(176 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has found that spiral arms do not typically make a large difference to the global star formation rate in numerical simulations galaxies (Dobbs et al 2011;Pettitt et al 2017;Tress et al 2020;Kim et al 2020), rather the gas is simply gathered together in the spiral arms (Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1986;Vogel et al 1988). Observations of nearby arms in our Galaxy suggest they do not have a significant role (Eden et al 2013(Eden et al , 2015Urquhart et al 2021), however there is some recent observational evidence that spiral arms have some impact on star formation rates over larger galaxy samples (Yu et al 2021). Colombo et al (2014) also find more massive, and strongly star forming GMCs in the spiral arms of M51 compared to the inter-arm regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Previous work has found that spiral arms do not typically make a large difference to the global star formation rate in numerical simulations galaxies (Dobbs et al 2011;Pettitt et al 2017;Tress et al 2020;Kim et al 2020), rather the gas is simply gathered together in the spiral arms (Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1986;Vogel et al 1988). Observations of nearby arms in our Galaxy suggest they do not have a significant role (Eden et al 2013(Eden et al , 2015Urquhart et al 2021), however there is some recent observational evidence that spiral arms have some impact on star formation rates over larger galaxy samples (Yu et al 2021). Colombo et al (2014) also find more massive, and strongly star forming GMCs in the spiral arms of M51 compared to the inter-arm regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Previous work has found that spiral arms do not typically make a large difference to the global star formation rate in numerical simulations galaxies (Dobbs et al 2011;Pettitt et al 2017;Tress et al 2020;Kim et al 2020), rather the gas is simply gathered together in the spiral arms (Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1986;Vogel et al 1988). Observations of nearby arms in our Galaxy suggest they do not have a significant role (Eden et al 2013(Eden et al , 2015Urquhart et al 2021), however there is some recent observational evidence that spiral arms have some impact on star formation rates over larger galaxy samples (Yu et al 2021). Colombo et al (2014) also find more massive, and strongly star forming GMCs in the spiral arms of M51 compared to the inter-arm regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The SEDIGISM survey is a 13 CO and C 18 O (2-1) survey conducted with the APEX telescope. 1 In a previous paper, (Urquhart et al 2021) we combined the ATLASGAL sample of clumps with the reduced data cubes provided by the SEDIGISM catalogue to extract spectra towards clumps where the two surveys overlapped (i.e. 300 • < < 18 • and |b| < 0.5 • ).…”
Section: Radial Velocities and Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%