1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00040161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedgwick-rafter cell counts: a procedural analysis

Abstract: Information in the existing literature on some aspects of the collection and statistical analysis of Sedgwick-Rafter cell data appears contradictory, confusing, or absent . Using data from an experimental phytoplankton population as a basis, an investigation of S-R cell procedure has been undertaken with the following conclusions : ,) settling time depends upon the type of preservation and the composition of the sample ; 2) the field counting technique gives more accurate data and is less time consuming than t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells were counted in a Sedgwick rafter slide using standard methodology (Woelkerling et al, 1976). Biovolume was calculated by approximating cells to a sphere (Hillebrand et al, 1999).…”
Section: Cell Enumeration Cell Volume Chl a And Nutrient Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were counted in a Sedgwick rafter slide using standard methodology (Woelkerling et al, 1976). Biovolume was calculated by approximating cells to a sphere (Hillebrand et al, 1999).…”
Section: Cell Enumeration Cell Volume Chl a And Nutrient Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large filamentous algae were cut with scissors such that well-mixed aliquots of the sample could be obtained. Wet mounts on a ruled microscope slide (NeoSci, Nashua, New Hampshire) with a 16-mm 2 grid divided into eight 2-mm 2 squares were used to determine percent composition as described by Woelkerling et al (1976) and Schoen (1988). Soft algae within a 2-mm 2 square were observed at 100£, 400£, and 1000£ magnification, identified to the lowest taxon possible, and enumerated until at least 300 taxa were counted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several statistical studies of phytoplankton enumeration techniques have endorsed the counting of random fields over transects for increasing the accuracy and precision of within-chamber density estimates (Uehlinger, 1964;Woelkerling, Kowal & Gough, 1976). Although these studies were concerned primarily with other types of counting chambers, we strongly endorse the counting of random fields as the standard strategy for use with inverted microscope chambers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%