Abstract:ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to pool, harmonise and re-analyse national accelerometer data from adults in four European countries in order to describe population levels of sedentary time and physical inactivity.MethodsFive cross-sectional studies were included from England, Portugal, Norway and Sweden. ActiGraph accelerometer count data were centrally processed using the same algorithms. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to study the associations of sedentary time and physic… Show more
“…In the present study, the time spent in moderate-and vigorousintensity activities was similar between the two weight statuses (4.9% vs. 3.6%, 0.4% vs. 0.005%) and close to those observed by [20]. Surprisingly, the mean time spent in moderate-intensity activities was close to the 30 minutes recommended by international physical activity guidelines, regardless of the participant's BMI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The sedentary behaviors of normal weight subjects were assessed in the same proportion (approximately 60-65%) by eMouveRecherche and ActiGraph. The time percentage spent in lightintensity activity by normal weight participants was situated midway between the percentages indicated by [18,20]. By contrast, these values were far from those concerning the time percentages of the overweight/ obese participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Like the smartphone, ActiGraph uses accelerometry data to assess time spent in different activity categories. [20] used ActiGraph to study physical activity and sedentary behaviors of European participants and found that obese people had a significantly higher odds ratio of sitting more than 10 hours per day than normal weight people. However, regardless of their BMI (< 25, 25 -30, > 30 kg.m -2 ), the participants spent about 60-62% of their time in sedentary behavior, 34-35% in light activity, 3-4% in moderate-intensity activities and 0.08-0.4% in vigorous-intensity activities (Electronic Supplementary Material Table S1).…”
Physical inactivity and long sedentary time are involved in the development of chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the intensity of spontaneous physical activity in two population samples consisting of 30 normal weight and 30 overweight or obese adults. Physical activity on an ordinary day was evaluated using the eMouveRecherche application that collected and sent smartphone accelerometry data to the ActivCollector Web platform via Internet. The algorithms implemented on the platform can accurately discriminate between sedentary and active behaviors, including their duration expressed in minutes and in percentage of waking period, in real time and ecological conditions. Physical activities are divided into four categories by the algorithms according to their intensity: immobility, light, moderate and vigorous intensity. The data were collected in 2013 and 2014 in Clermont-Ferrand and analyzed in 2015-2017. Time spent in only two categories was found to differ between the two populations. Immobile activities were longer in overweight than in normal weight participants (652 min vs. 504 min, 81.4% vs. 65.0%, p<0.0001). In contrast, the light-intensity activities were more popular in normal weight than in overweight participants (215 min vs. 124 min, 29.5% vs. 15.4%, p<0.0001). No difference was observed for either the moderate-or vigorous-intensity categories. BMI and waist circumference were positively correlated with immobility and negatively with light-intensity activities. The results provided additional interesting indications in terms of time spent in light-intensity activities associated with normal weight status and seem to support the positive effect of this activity category on health.
Highlights• eMouveRecherche discriminates between normal-and overweight participants' activities.• Overweight and normal weight subjects are sedentary 80% and 65% of the time.• Light activities take up 29% and 15% of the time in normal and overweight subjects• No difference in time is spent in moderate activity in either weight status category• Long light-intensity activity is associated with lower BMI and waist circumference
“…In the present study, the time spent in moderate-and vigorousintensity activities was similar between the two weight statuses (4.9% vs. 3.6%, 0.4% vs. 0.005%) and close to those observed by [20]. Surprisingly, the mean time spent in moderate-intensity activities was close to the 30 minutes recommended by international physical activity guidelines, regardless of the participant's BMI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The sedentary behaviors of normal weight subjects were assessed in the same proportion (approximately 60-65%) by eMouveRecherche and ActiGraph. The time percentage spent in lightintensity activity by normal weight participants was situated midway between the percentages indicated by [18,20]. By contrast, these values were far from those concerning the time percentages of the overweight/ obese participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Like the smartphone, ActiGraph uses accelerometry data to assess time spent in different activity categories. [20] used ActiGraph to study physical activity and sedentary behaviors of European participants and found that obese people had a significantly higher odds ratio of sitting more than 10 hours per day than normal weight people. However, regardless of their BMI (< 25, 25 -30, > 30 kg.m -2 ), the participants spent about 60-62% of their time in sedentary behavior, 34-35% in light activity, 3-4% in moderate-intensity activities and 0.08-0.4% in vigorous-intensity activities (Electronic Supplementary Material Table S1).…”
Physical inactivity and long sedentary time are involved in the development of chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the intensity of spontaneous physical activity in two population samples consisting of 30 normal weight and 30 overweight or obese adults. Physical activity on an ordinary day was evaluated using the eMouveRecherche application that collected and sent smartphone accelerometry data to the ActivCollector Web platform via Internet. The algorithms implemented on the platform can accurately discriminate between sedentary and active behaviors, including their duration expressed in minutes and in percentage of waking period, in real time and ecological conditions. Physical activities are divided into four categories by the algorithms according to their intensity: immobility, light, moderate and vigorous intensity. The data were collected in 2013 and 2014 in Clermont-Ferrand and analyzed in 2015-2017. Time spent in only two categories was found to differ between the two populations. Immobile activities were longer in overweight than in normal weight participants (652 min vs. 504 min, 81.4% vs. 65.0%, p<0.0001). In contrast, the light-intensity activities were more popular in normal weight than in overweight participants (215 min vs. 124 min, 29.5% vs. 15.4%, p<0.0001). No difference was observed for either the moderate-or vigorous-intensity categories. BMI and waist circumference were positively correlated with immobility and negatively with light-intensity activities. The results provided additional interesting indications in terms of time spent in light-intensity activities associated with normal weight status and seem to support the positive effect of this activity category on health.
Highlights• eMouveRecherche discriminates between normal-and overweight participants' activities.• Overweight and normal weight subjects are sedentary 80% and 65% of the time.• Light activities take up 29% and 15% of the time in normal and overweight subjects• No difference in time is spent in moderate activity in either weight status category• Long light-intensity activity is associated with lower BMI and waist circumference
“…The use of accelerometers has allowed the objective daily living‐related PA estimation through motions derived from ambulation. Studies that aimed to improve the insight into the preventive role of objectively measured PA and health‐related conditions at older ages have applied thresholds validated in healthy young adults for PA intensity categorization . This could have led to inaccuracy and misclassification of actual PA behaviours, generating an overestimation of SB and underestimation of actual PA, due to differences in energy cost of a given activity in older adults, when compared with younger cohorts .…”
Background
The associations between free‐living physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) and sarcopenia in older people and its determinants are controversial. Self‐reporting, the use of one‐size‐fits‐all cut‐points for intensity categorization when using accelerometers and the absence of a clear sarcopenia definition hampered explorations. The aim of this study is to describe the associations between objectively measured PA patterns and sarcopenia and its determinants.
Methods
Subjects aged >65 with valid accelerometry and sarcopenia‐related measures from Toledo Study of Healthy Aging (TSHA) were included. Muscle mass (MM) was estimated by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Handgrip strength (HS) was measured by dynamometry. Physical performance assessment relied on gait speed (GS). Sarcopenia presence was ascertained using Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) criteria. PA and SB were estimated by ActiTrainer worn for 1 week and classified into time spent in SB and different PA intensity bands [light PA (LPA) and moderate‐to‐vigorous PA (MVPA)] using age‐specific cut‐points. Different multivariate linear and logistic regression models [(i) single‐parameter, (ii) partition, and (iii) isotemporal substitution models] were used for estimating associations between PA, SB, and sarcopenia determinants and sarcopenia rates, respectively. All models adjusted for age, sex, co‐morbidities (Charlson index), and functional ability (Katz and Lawton indexes).
Results
Five hundred twelve subjects from the TSHA had available data (78.08 ± 5.71 years of age; 54.3% women). FNIH sarcopenia assessment was performed in 497 subjects (23.3% were sarcopenic). In the linear regression, the single‐parameter model showed an association between MVPA and all sarcopenia determinants. In the partition model, MVPA was associated with greater MM and GS. The isotemporal substitution showed that reallocating 1 h/day of MVPA displacing SB was associated with greater values in MM [
β
= 0.014; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.004, 0.024;
P
< 0.01], GS (
β
= 0.082; 95% CI = 0.054, 0.110;
P
< 0.001), and HS (
β
= 0.888; 95% CI = 0.145, 1.631;
P
< 0.05). In the logistic regression, the single‐parameter model yielded a significant association between 1 h/day increase in MVPA and sarcopenia reduction [odds ratio (OR) = 0.522; 95% CI = 0.367, 0.726;
P
< 0.001], as did the partition model (OR = 0.555; 95% CI = 0.376, 0.799;
P
< 0.01). The reallocation of 1 h/day SB only yielded a significant lower sarcopenia risk by almost 50% when it was substituted with MVPA, whereas the substitution of 15 min/day yielded a significant lower sarcopenia risk by 15% (
P
< 0.001) but did not show any association...
“…Further, it recommended weekly participation in muscle‐strengthening activities on two or more days . Data from device‐measured PA demonstrate that only about 19%‐33% of the European adult population comply with the PA recommendations …”
The aims of the present study were (a) to assess PA level and prevalence meeting PA recommendations at onset and after 12 months of fitness club membership, and (b) to identify socioeconomic status (SES), and compare this in participants with high (≥two weekly sessions) exercise frequency and low (≤one exercise session/week) exercise frequency. PA level was measured by ActiGraph GT1M in 125 new fitness club members at onset and 12 months. A total of 250 participants answered a questionnaire covering SES and exercise frequency. To examine changes in PA level and the prevalence meeting PA recommendations, paired t tests or McNemar's test was used. No changes were found in total PA level (counts per minute (cpm)) (359.3 ± 109.5 vs 375.8 ± 123.1 cpm, P = .226) or MVPA (19.4 ± 14.8 vs 21.3 ± 17.9 minutes/d, P = .358) at 12 months. PA recommendation (≥150 minutes/wk of moderate to vigorous PA) was met by 37.7% and 45.9% at onset and after 12 months. Exercise frequency was not associated with SES. We found no increase in PA level the first year of fitness club membership. SES was not associated with regular use of the fitness club.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.