2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00989.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedation and neuromuscular blockade in paediatric intensive care: a review of current practice in the UK

Abstract: Relatively few units possess clinical guidelines for the sedation of critically ill children, and only a minority formally assess sedation levels. Where neuromuscular blocking agents are administered, sedation is frequently inadequately assessed and the depth of neuromuscular blockade is rarely estimated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
31
2
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
6
31
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] In the United Kingdom, 31% of critically ill children are likely to receive NBDs, but the depth of the blockade is routinely assessed in only 16% of patients. 2 Results of a recent survey 4 indicated that only 22% of Canadian ICUs use standardized protocols for NBD application and that 16% of all Canadian intensive care providers do not use neuromuscular transmission monitoring at all. Absence of neuromuscular transmission monitoring during repetitive administration of NBDs may be a patient safety issue, because partial paralysis is difficult to detect without neuromuscular transmission monitoring 6 and has been known to persist more than 72 h in critically ill patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] In the United Kingdom, 31% of critically ill children are likely to receive NBDs, but the depth of the blockade is routinely assessed in only 16% of patients. 2 Results of a recent survey 4 indicated that only 22% of Canadian ICUs use standardized protocols for NBD application and that 16% of all Canadian intensive care providers do not use neuromuscular transmission monitoring at all. Absence of neuromuscular transmission monitoring during repetitive administration of NBDs may be a patient safety issue, because partial paralysis is difficult to detect without neuromuscular transmission monitoring 6 and has been known to persist more than 72 h in critically ill patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral nerve stimulation may be used to assess the level of neuromuscular blockade, and routine daily discontinuation of the drug can help monitor likely time to recovery. A survey of the UK paediatric intensive care practice suggested 16 % (range 0-60 %) of children receiving neuromuscular blockers would have routine monitoring using a peripheral nerve stimulator (Playfor et al 2003 ). Only 38 % of units reported using temporary discontinuation of paralysis to assess neuromuscular recovery (Playfor et al 2003 ).…”
Section: Assessing Adequacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main indications for use of sedatives include reducing anxiety and agitation, inducing amnesia, facilitating mechanical ventilation, preventing displacement of endotracheal tubes, and reducing cellular metabolism. [64][65][66][67][68] The consequences of prolonged use of sedative agents in the PICU www.ajcconline.org Pressure injuries remain a common problem in critically ill infants and children.…”
Section: Sedationmentioning
confidence: 99%