Security tactics selection poker (TaSPeR)

Osses, Felipe; Márquez, Gastón; Villegas, Mónica M.; Orellana, Cristian; Visconti, Marcello; Astudillo, Hernán

doi:10.1145/3241403.3241459

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consensual selection is supported by TaSPeR [28], a consensus-building technique that allows practitioners to identify, argue for, and choose among architectural design decisions according to objectives and priorities. TaSPer extends the Planning Poker technique [29] to allow a group to agree on what design decisions should be used to develop a software architecture.…”

Section: Stakeholders and µAzimutmentioning

confidence: 99%

Involving Stakeholders in the Implementation of Microservice-Based Systems: A Case Study in an Ambient-Assisted Living System

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Stakeholders and µAzimutmentioning

confidence: 99%

Involving Stakeholders in the Implementation of Microservice-Based Systems: A Case Study in an Ambient-Assisted Living System

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The D&I framework determines clinical priorities through an event (e.g., meeting or workshop) that allows stakeholders to make decisions by consensus. This step follows others inspired by practical experiences (such as [29] [30] [31]) to discuss, vote on and select decisions. Therefore, the steps that the D&I framework establishes for selecting clinical priorities are as follows:…”

Section: A Phase I: Stakeholders and Clinical Prioritiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Dissemination and Implementation Strategies to Evaluate Requirement Elicitation Guidelines: A Case Study in a Bed Management System

Márquez

Taramasco

2020

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clinical software is a fundamental tool for supporting healthcare systems because it improves the quality of patient care and automatizes the most frequently performed clinical tasks. Nevertheless, since health systems include various components, such as supplies, transportation, laboratories, and interoperability, eliciting the most critical requirements for understanding the problem that the clinical software must solve is quite a complex task. Indeed, the requirement elicitation process may directly determine the success or failure of the clinical software. In this article, we present the D&I framework, a methodology that uses dissemination and implementation strategies to recommend guidelines for the elicitation of clinical software requirements. The objective of this framework is to support software developers in the identification of key requirements with the goal of more holistically understanding the problem to be solved by the clinical software. We evaluated the D&I framework with a real case study related to a bed management system. We employed a usability instrument with 50 clinicians to evaluate tasks in software modules that represent clinical priorities defined by stakeholders. The results indicate that the perception of usability by end users is acceptable, suggesting that the evaluated tasks satisfy the established clinical priorities. The D&I framework provides a starting point for research and discussion about the contribution of dissemination and implementation strategies to the body of knowledge about requirement engineering.

show abstract

Evaluating Impact of Experience in Architectural Design Decision-Making Techniques: An Experimental Study

Brito

Beroiza

Márquez

et al. 2019

2019 38th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security tactics selection poker (TaSPeR)

Cited by 5 publications

References 9 publications

Involving Stakeholders in the Implementation of Microservice-Based Systems: A Case Study in an Ambient-Assisted Living System

Involving Stakeholders in the Implementation of Microservice-Based Systems: A Case Study in an Ambient-Assisted Living System

Using Dissemination and Implementation Strategies to Evaluate Requirement Elicitation Guidelines: A Case Study in a Bed Management System

Evaluating Impact of Experience in Architectural Design Decision-Making Techniques: An Experimental Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About