Security Requirements for Software Development

Kim, Tai-hoon; Shin, Min Jae; Kim, Sang-ho; Sang, Jun

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30134-9_17

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If the TCCD of the candidate set is less than that of the linking set minus the calibration error threshold, that is, TCCD candidate set < TCCD linking set − error threshold, the linking set is replaced by the candidate set; otherwise the linking set remains unchanged. (4) Update I 4 by performing linking between I 1 and I 3 using the updated linking set using STUIRT (Kim & Kolen, 2004). L, R, and remaining set are also updated.…”

Section: Remove Stepmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Stepwise Test Characteristic Curve Method to Detect Item Parameter Drift

Guo

Zheng

Chang

2015

J Educational Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An important assumption of item response theory is item parameter invariance. Sometimes, however, item parameters are not invariant across different test administrations due to factors other than sampling error; this phenomenon is termed item parameter drift. Several methods have been developed to detect drifted items. However, most of the existing methods were designed to detect drifts in individual items, which may not be adequate for test characteristic curve–based linking or equating. One example is the item response theory–based true score equating, whose goal is to generate a conversion table to relate number‐correct scores on two forms based on their test characteristic curves. This article introduces a stepwise test characteristic curve method to detect item parameter drift iteratively based on test characteristic curves without needing to set any predetermined critical values. Comparisons are made between the proposed method and two existing methods under the three‐parameter logistic item response model through simulation and real data analysis. Results show that the proposed method produces a small difference in test characteristic curves between administrations, an accurate conversion table, and a good classification of drifted and nondrifted items and at the same time keeps a large amount of linking items.

show abstract

Section: Remove Stepmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IPD detection. I 1 and I 3 were linked to generate I 4 using the Stocking-Lord test characteristic curve method (Stocking & Lord, 1983) via the computer program STUIRT (Kim & Kolen, 2004). After initial linking using all common items, different methods were implemented to detect IPD by comparing I 1 and I 4 .…”

Section: Ipd Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%