Security, recognition, and misgivings: Exploring older same-sex couples’ experiences of legally recognized same-sex marriage

Lannutti, Pamela J.

doi:10.1177/0265407510386136

Cited by 34 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Past studies have found mixed reactions in the LGBT community to the proposed legalization of same-sex marriage, and they have highlighted both perceived benefits and misgivings among those in same-sex relationships (Lannutti, 2005(Lannutti, , 2006(Lannutti, , 2007(Lannutti, , 2011. However, a clear majority (90%) of our sample of individuals in samesex relationships indicated that they believe the option to legally marry is important to their relationship.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples

Haas

Whitton

2015

Journal of Homosexuality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because marriage has been denied to same-sex couples, it is likely that the meaning and significance ascribed to non-marital cohabitation may be unique. Further, it is unclear whether same-sex couples view marriage as important to their relationships, and if they do, why. Using qualitative data from 526 individuals in cohabiting same-sex relationships across 47 states, we explored (1) the meaning and significance of cohabitation and (2) the perceived importance of legal marriage to the relationship. Participants viewed cohabitation as significant, most commonly because it indicates long-term commitment, provides emotional support, makes the couple a family, and allows them to share life together. Marriage was perceived as important to a majority (90%), most commonly because it confers financial and legal benefits, relational legitimacy, and demonstrates the same commitment as different-sex couples. Overall, findings highlight the symbolic significance of cohabitation and importance of access to legal marriage to adults in same-sex relationships.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples

Haas

Whitton

2015

Journal of Homosexuality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Beyond being just a barometer of acceptance, recognition of a relationship's legality is salient because legal recognition provides rights and protections (Oswald & Kuvalanka, ), relationship security and confidence (Whitton et al, ), and structural and moral barriers to leaving the union (Johnson, Caughlin, & Huston, ; see also Herek, ; Lannutti, ). For example, before same‐sex marriage was legalized, many couples sought ways to provide a sense of security and certainty, such as filing power of attorney to establish legal interdependence (see Oswald, ; Riggle, Rostosky, Prather, & Hamrin, ; see also Porche & Purvin, ).…”

Section: The Cru Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contextual Relational Uncertainty Model: Understanding Ambiguity in a Changing Sociopolitical Context of Marriage

Monk

Ogolsky

2019

J of Family Theo & Revie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Uncertainty about the future of a close relationship is important to consider given the association between relational uncertainty and well‐being. These concerns and questions are likely compounded by accelerated rates of societal change that are rife with ambiguity, which could erode relational confidence, especially for those in marginalized unions. Despite the importance of the sociopolitical environment, there is limited insight into how this context might shape various forms of uncertainty. Thus, we propose an integrative framework, the contextual relational uncertainty model, to understand the intersection of contextual ambiguity and relational uncertainty during times of change for individuals in marginalized relationships. As an exemplar of sociopolitical transitions, we describe the changes related to same‐sex marriage in the 21st century to illustrate the utility and initial explication of the model. We describe suggestions for future research and clinical implications of exploring sociopolitical uncertainty, as well as its antecedents and consequences.

show abstract

“…At such times, health professionals may not understand or support the role of same-sex partners and friends in end-of-life decision making (Hash 2006), especially where there is no legal recognition of same-sex marriage (Lannutti 2011). Additionally, as discussed, when relationships are not recognised, bereaved partners and friends miss out on the social support necessary for coping with grief (Blevins and Werth 2006).…”

Section: Glbt People's Experiences With End-of-life Care and Advance mentioning

confidence: 99%

End-of-life care for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people

Cartwright

Hughes

Lienert

2012

Culture, Health & Sexuality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is little understanding in Australia of the particular issues faced by gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) people in end-of-life care and advance care planning. This exploratory qualitative study aimed to achieve an initial understanding of these issues to compare with the international literature and inform the development of a larger study involving GLBT consumers. Consultations were carried out with 19 service providers and 6 GLBT community members located in the Northern Rivers and metropolitan Sydney areas of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Participants reported barriers to health care service access due to discrimination, inappropriate care, and lack of knowledge among both consumers and health care workers of legal rights at the end of life. While advance care planning can assist with improving end-of-life care, respondents reported a number of obstacles. These included a lack of knowledge and absence of perceived need, and the additional obstacle of social isolation, leading to difficulties identifying alternative decisionmakers. The study highlighted the need for community education among GLBT people and health and aged care providers on the existing legal provisions available to prevent discrimination in end-of-life care.

show abstract

Security, recognition, and misgivings: Exploring older same-sex couples’ experiences of legally recognized same-sex marriage

Cited by 34 publications

References 32 publications

The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples

The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples

Contextual Relational Uncertainty Model: Understanding Ambiguity in a Changing Sociopolitical Context of Marriage

End-of-life care for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About