2012
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.637067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security in a sea of insecurity: job security and intention to stay among service sector employees in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moderating role of job security. Job security can be identified as an employee's evaluation of his or her current employment conditions and perception of his or her future in current job (Zeytinoglu et al, 2012). As a subjective phenomenon, job security refers to the employee's subjective assessment of how likely he or she is to lose the job in the near future.…”
Section: Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moderating role of job security. Job security can be identified as an employee's evaluation of his or her current employment conditions and perception of his or her future in current job (Zeytinoglu et al, 2012). As a subjective phenomenon, job security refers to the employee's subjective assessment of how likely he or she is to lose the job in the near future.…”
Section: Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a subjective phenomenon, job security refers to the employee's subjective assessment of how likely he or she is to lose the job in the near future. Objective conceptualization of job security reflects the employment conditions of the contract, working full-time hours and paid and unpaid overtime (Zeytinoglu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intention to stay has been measured amongst many occupational groups such as physician assistants (Graham 2012), IT personnel (Eom 2015), service sector employees in Turkey (Zeytinoglu et al, 2012), engineers in Malaysia (Anvari et al 2014), and personal support workers (Zeytinoglu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Intention To Staymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such factors are of particular relevance to younger employees who may not be motivated as much by monetary rewards as were previous generations (see, for example, Myers and Sadaghiani, ) and may instead seek more meaningful roles with greater long‐term potential. Other subsidiary factors influencing intentions to stay include geographical proximity of an organization (Latukha, ); positive perceptions of job security (Yamamoto, ; Zeytinoglu et al , ); and positive relationships with supervisors and co‐workers (Boxall et al , ; Gow et al , ). Conversely, excessive workload can influence employees to seek alternative employment (Gibbons, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%