Online Assessment and Measurement 2005
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-720-1.ch014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Securing and Proctoring Online Tests

Abstract: Online course delivery has introduced a new spectrum of opportunities not only for innovative pedagogical approaches, but also for cheating. This chapter provides instructors with methods to deter students from cheating in online assessments either by limiting the opportunity to cheat or by reducing their motivation for doing so. Through an extensive discussion of research literature, we provide an exploration of cheating that includes: definitions, cost and effects, ethical considerations, motivations for che… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, in these studies, the "security" factor has always been the center of investigations in this decision as it is the key factor or the main problem when implementing this tool, since its effectiveness in reducing cheating in remote evaluations of exams created mistrust and insecurity [8,[110][111][112] and many institutions did not dare to use it despite studies confirming its effectiveness and advising its use in educational institutions for remote evaluations [113][114][115][116].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, in these studies, the "security" factor has always been the center of investigations in this decision as it is the key factor or the main problem when implementing this tool, since its effectiveness in reducing cheating in remote evaluations of exams created mistrust and insecurity [8,[110][111][112] and many institutions did not dare to use it despite studies confirming its effectiveness and advising its use in educational institutions for remote evaluations [113][114][115][116].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%