2015
DOI: 10.3390/sym7020675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure Cooperative Spectrum Sensing via a Novel User-Classification Scheme in Cognitive Radios for Future Communication Technologies

Abstract: Future communication networks would be required to deliver data on a far greater scale than is known to us today, thus mandating the maximal utilization of the available radio spectrum using cognitive radios. In this paper, we have proposed a novel cooperative spectrum sensing approach for cognitive radios. In cooperative spectrum sensing, the fusion center relies on reports of the cognitive users to make a global decision. The global decision is obtained by assigning weights to the reports received from cogni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The local choices are sent to The FC as ๐ธ๐ธ ๐‘—๐‘— in which = ,3, โ‹ฏ , ๐‘‚๐‘‚. Due to the fact that different CR users in CSS have different sensing capacities, different local sensing outcomes are produced [44]. We employ a weight-oriented decision combination at the FC in the suggested approach.…”
Section: Effective Spectrum Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local choices are sent to The FC as ๐ธ๐ธ ๐‘—๐‘— in which = ,3, โ‹ฏ , ๐‘‚๐‘‚. Due to the fact that different CR users in CSS have different sensing capacities, different local sensing outcomes are produced [44]. We employ a weight-oriented decision combination at the FC in the suggested approach.…”
Section: Effective Spectrum Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharifi et al presented a weighted likelihood ratio rest (WLRT) in [15] to mitigate the effect of Byzantine attack, in which the collaborative weight is calculated by comparing the sensing history of each user with the reliable anchor nodes' global decision. In another work, Usman and Insoo proposed a simple, but the efficient classification method in [16] that classifies the SUs into reliable, neutral and unreliable categories. Byzantines are restricted by assigning the lowest weight, and the trustworthy SUs are encouraged by assigning higher weights accordingly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, . In CSS, the sensing capabilities of CR users are different from each other which results in different local sensing results [40]. In the proposed scheme, we use a weightbased decision combination at the FC.…”
Section: Cooperative Spectrum Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%