Secular Trends in an Adjective Checklist

Hofstee, Willem

doi:10.1177/001316446602600208

Educational and Psychological Measurement

1966

DOI: 10.1177/001316446602600208

|View full text |Cite

Secular Trends in an Adjective Checklist

Willem Hofstee¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1967

1970

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Insofar as the person is aware that the items are from a homogenous pool, spuriously high interitem correlations may be expected. This potential source of bias, which will be referred to as response halo, may be considered to be a special case of secular trends (Hofstee, 1966). Response halo is not the same as response style.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Item Arrangement and Bias in an Interest Inventory1

Halpern

1967

ETS Research Bulletin Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Item Arrangement and Bias in an Interest Inventory1

Halpern

1967

ETS Research Bulletin Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Item Arrangement and Bias in an Interest Inventory

Halpern

1968

Educational and Psychological Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Method Effects in Judging the Desirability of Traits

Hofstee

1969

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT 1969, 29, 583-604. DESIRABILITY judgments of trait-descriptive items have been collected by several investigators for a variety of reasons. One such aim is to obtain item indices to be used in the construction of forced-choice tests (e.g. have called attention to the multidimensionality of the social desirability concept, or alternatively, to systematic individual differences in desirability judgments. In view of the diverse and widespread use that is made of these judgments, it is of interest to know whether sources other than differences between items and between individuals, together with their interaction, are influential. The present study represents an extensive search for method variance in desirability judgments of traits. Specifically, position and

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Secular Trends in an Adjective Checklist

Cited by 4 publications

References 3 publications

Item Arrangement and Bias in an Interest Inventory1

Item Arrangement and Bias in an Interest Inventory1

Item Arrangement and Bias in an Interest Inventory

Method Effects in Judging the Desirability of Traits

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About