2015
DOI: 10.1080/21567689.2015.1012160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Secular Retaliation’: A Case Study of Integralist Populism, Anti-Muslim Discourse, and (Il)liberal Discourse on Secularism in Contemporary France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These phenomena certainly can (and probably they have already done it) create the environment and the overall socio-political context for developing negative attitudes toward Muslims and Islam in the West as well as its satellite countries (which Croatia certainly is). This is also supported by a number of recent papers in (Western) Europe addressing the theme of Islam and Muslims (Adida et al 2010;Bleich 2009;Carr and Haynes 2013;Ciftci 2012;Elchardus and Spruyt 2014;Fetzer and Soper 2003;Field 2007;González et al 2008;Mandel 2014;Nilsson 2015;Savelkoul et al 2012;Spruyt and Elchardus 2012;Strabac and Listhaug 2008;Wike and Grim 2010). Many of them refer to the increased values of negative attitudes toward Muslims in Europe, which can be brought in the context of immigration and terrorism, poor economic conditions, the cultural heritage of communism and the lack of democratic tradition in post-communist countries (Jeong 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These phenomena certainly can (and probably they have already done it) create the environment and the overall socio-political context for developing negative attitudes toward Muslims and Islam in the West as well as its satellite countries (which Croatia certainly is). This is also supported by a number of recent papers in (Western) Europe addressing the theme of Islam and Muslims (Adida et al 2010;Bleich 2009;Carr and Haynes 2013;Ciftci 2012;Elchardus and Spruyt 2014;Fetzer and Soper 2003;Field 2007;González et al 2008;Mandel 2014;Nilsson 2015;Savelkoul et al 2012;Spruyt and Elchardus 2012;Strabac and Listhaug 2008;Wike and Grim 2010). Many of them refer to the increased values of negative attitudes toward Muslims in Europe, which can be brought in the context of immigration and terrorism, poor economic conditions, the cultural heritage of communism and the lack of democratic tradition in post-communist countries (Jeong 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…First, boundary work is a dynamic process involving a whole array of social actors who are not necessarily in accord with one another regarding boundary configuration and act to advocate or reinforce their own social groups’ entitlement to setting the parameters of symbolic demarcation and challenge others’ (e.g., Ahmad ; Edgell et al. ; Edgell and Tranby ; Nilsson ; Onwuegnuchulam and Mtshali ; Sayegh ; Vaitheespara ). In China, the authoritarian party‐state has positioned itself to prescribe ideological discourses on national identity.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Drawing on discourse theory (Howarth & Stavrakakis, 2000;Torfing, 2005), I more specifically set out to discuss, to quote Whitney Phillips and Ryan M. Milner (2020: 8), "the underlying tonal, behavioral, and aesthetic characteristics" of sardonic irony -as in the case with the Orcish invasion -to assess its political function as an uncivil discursive practice. The analysis is explorative and argumentative and discusses in detail a handful of examples from voices of the French post-fascist media ecology and party politics; these examples are illustrative of findings in my earlier research on post-fascist movements and discourse in contemporary France (Nilsson, 2015;. While the generalisability of this analysis should of course be treated with caution, it is my contention that they will encourage further exploration of uncivility from this perspective and lay the basis for more thorough qualitative and quantitative analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%