1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1998)10:6<765::aid-ajhb8>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secular change in running performance of Japanese adolescents: A longitudinal developmental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in girls, on average, the running time decreases, reaches a plateau, and then increases. In addition, a few girls did not improve in the dash performance during the period of observation (Watanabe et al, 1998). The pattern of age-related change is much more similar between sexes in growth variables (monotonic increases) and to some extent in the endurance run, which in many boys also reaches a plateau and then shows an increase in running time (Watanabe et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in girls, on average, the running time decreases, reaches a plateau, and then increases. In addition, a few girls did not improve in the dash performance during the period of observation (Watanabe et al, 1998). The pattern of age-related change is much more similar between sexes in growth variables (monotonic increases) and to some extent in the endurance run, which in many boys also reaches a plateau and then shows an increase in running time (Watanabe et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mean age at the first measurement was 12.6 ± 0.3 years. For detailed information on the measurements, see Watanabe et al (1998).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age at the first measurement (the first grade) was 12.6 ± 0.3 years. For detailed information on the measurements, see Watanabe et al (1998).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%