2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.econ.2019.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sectoral labour reallocation: An agent-based model of structural change and growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A heterogeneous, multi-industry set-up, with constant allocation of consumption shares characterises the multi-country model in . A three-sector structural change model, modulated via Engel Law, is presented in Gabardo et al (2020). In general, this stream of ABM literature emphasizes the role of demand and consumption behaviours in shaping structural change.…”
Section: Related Evolutionary Agent-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A heterogeneous, multi-industry set-up, with constant allocation of consumption shares characterises the multi-country model in . A three-sector structural change model, modulated via Engel Law, is presented in Gabardo et al (2020). In general, this stream of ABM literature emphasizes the role of demand and consumption behaviours in shaping structural change.…”
Section: Related Evolutionary Agent-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Немногим меньшее влияние на количество работников с высоким уровнем навыков, динамику занятых со средним и высоким уровнями навыков оказывает доля промышленности в ВВП. С одной стороны, все большая доля занятых работает в сфере услуг в экономике каждой страны и в мире [Gabardo, Porcile, Pereima, 2020]. С другой стороны, информационная революция 1990-2000-х годов -период наращивания доли сферы услуг в ВВП в том числе за счет влияния технологий: в сфере услуг позже, чем в других секторах экономики, распространяются технологии, позволяющие нарастить масштаб производства [Buera, Kaboski, 2008].…”
Section: заключениеunclassified
“…In addition, their relationship and joint impact are likely. Boppart (2014), Gabardo et al (2019), Comin et al (2019) proposed models that allow us to analyze both explanations of structural changesincome and the relative prices (substitution) effectssimultaneously. For example, the Boppart (2014) model suggests that in 1946, 44 percent of observed structural changes are attributable to a relative price effects and 56 percent to the income effect; in 2011, the corresponding numbers are 53 percent and 47 percent, respectively; and the relative contribution of the substitution effect will asymptotically converge to 65 percent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%