Sector, Landscape or Rural Transformations? Exploring the Limits and Potential of Agricultural Sustainability Initiatives through a Cocoa Case Study

Abstract

This paper analyses the changing nature of sustainability initiatives and their capacity to tackle sustainability challenges, focusing on cocoa in West Africa, and distilling lessons pertinent across agro‐export industries and regions. Using data from empirical studies, literature review and consultations with key cocoa actors, we find ‘sustainable’ cocoa at a critical juncture. Applying an existing theoretical framework that distinguishes between resilience, transition and transformation of systems, we explore and analyse previous, current and future sustainability responses. We conclude that there are important innovations and upscaling of investment occurring in the cocoa sector on sustainability, but also that current approaches risk achieving only incremental change, helping to sustain the industry under deteriorating conditions (resilience), without enabling smallholders to claim rights and greater representation (transition) or tackling more fundamental root causes of the vulnerability of smallholders (transformation). Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

A move beyond sustainability certification: The evolution of the chocolate industry's sustainable sourcing practices

“…The last two decades have seen substantial shifts in the approaches companies have taken to sustainable cocoa sourcing. Much of the previous work on SSPs has focused on the adoption of individual tools such as certification (Auld, ; Bartley, ; Schouten & Bitzer, ), but only a handful of studies have examined changes over time (Bitzer, Glasbergen, & Leroy, ; Nelson & Phillips, ). This study confirms the need for a dynamic rather than static view of SSP adoption.…”

Governance of zero deforestation cocoa in West Africa: New forms of public–private interaction

“…This concept emerged in the international REDD+ discourse as implementing and donor countries realized the limits in terms of scope and scale of a project-based approach to REDD+. A similar transition can be perceived in the context of sustainable commodity sourcing, where the transition from farm-level sustainability efforts to sector-wide and/or landscape-level efforts is explained by the inability of sustainability standards such as Rainforest Alliance or UTZ to scale their impact beyond small-scale projects, which have been some term "islands of excellence" (Nelson & Phillips, 2018).…”

“…A similar transition can be perceived in the context of sustainable commodity sourcing, where the transition from farm-level sustainability efforts to sector-wide and/or landscape-level efforts is explained by the inability of sustainability standards such as Rainforest Alliance or UTZ to scale their impact beyond small-scale projects, which have been some term "islands of excellence" (Nelson & Phillips, 2018). To achieve up-scaling where a sizeable number of smallholder farmers can benefit from the zero deforestation cocoa program, the idea of a jurisdictional approach has been introduced whereby action is concentrated in select landscapes that reflect administrative boundaries to allow for state-led governance reforms and policy adjustments 8 http://www.climate-kic.org/start-ups/landmapp-2/ Numerous informants especially from Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana are touting the idea of a jurisdictional approach for zero deforestation cocoa.…”

Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development

“…Farm and food agribusinesses have diverse motives for engaging in rural landscape sustainability and adopt different types of approach, at a range of levels, with diverse effects. In a recent theme issue of this journal, Nelson, Rueda, and Vermeulen () argue that voluntary environmental initiatives, developed within the sector over recent decades, must be complemented by programs that offer “a wider, landscape‐scale perspective” “in which a larger set of stakeholders is engaged….” The need for a sustainability transition in rural agricultural landscapes has been the subject of inquiry in several disciplines, including ecology (e.g., Tilman et al, ), agronomy (e.g., Jordan & Warner, ), hydrology (e.g., Ogg & van Kooten, ), geochemistry (e.g., Yoo, Fisher, Ji, Aufdenkampe, & Klaminder, ), sociology (e.g., Arbuckle, ), and business (e.g., Nelson & Phillips, ). However, achieving more‐sustainable rural landscapes requires the integration of multiple disciplinary lenses to examine intersections of motivations and effects and to engage diverse disciplines and stakeholders for mutual understanding and benefit (Cash et al, ; Duff et al, ; Musacchio, ).…”

“…In a recent theme issue of this journal, Nelson, Rueda, and Vermeulen (2018) argue that voluntary environmental initiatives, developed within the sector over recent decades, must be complemented by programs that offer "a wider, landscape-scale perspective" "in which a larger set of stakeholders is engaged…." The need for a sustainability transition in rural agricultural landscapes has been the subject of inquiry in several disciplines, including ecology (e.g., Tilman et al, 2002), agronomy (e.g., Jordan & Warner, 2010), hydrology (e.g., Ogg & van Kooten, 2004), geochemistry (e.g., Yoo, Fisher, Ji, Aufdenkampe, & Klaminder, 2015), sociology (e.g., Arbuckle, 2016), and business (e.g., Nelson & Phillips, 2018).…”