2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sector analysis of dosimetry of prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data show that the CTV in postimplant prostate dosimetry is larger than that of the preimplant planning. This is mainly because of prostatic edema (11). The radiation coverage of the prostate at 1 month dosimetry was good in 192 patients (97%), whereas good CTV dose coverage was attained in only 165 patients (83%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data show that the CTV in postimplant prostate dosimetry is larger than that of the preimplant planning. This is mainly because of prostatic edema (11). The radiation coverage of the prostate at 1 month dosimetry was good in 192 patients (97%), whereas good CTV dose coverage was attained in only 165 patients (83%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, there are no clear guidelines to evaluate the quality of CTV dosimetry. Recently, we have shown that there are significant differences in dose coverage of different sectors of the prostate between preplan and postimplant dosimetry (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other studies have reported that prostate volume also affects D 90 , our study did not find this correlation to be statistically significant, likely because all of our patients had a prostate volume < 50 cc. Previous studies analyzing implant quality have reported a tendency for lower doses to be delivered anteriorly as compared to the posterior prostate in patients treated with LDR brachytherapy [19, 20]. In a multi-institutional analysis of 4547 patients, Merrick et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of prostate cancers, however, occur in the peripheral zone, and the WP dosimetric parameters do not account for the zonal anatomy of the prostate nor capture the heterogeneity in dose distribution within the prostate [7,8]. Herein, the influence of zone-specific dosimetry on rates of biochemical failure and toxicity is described.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%