2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1610.08458
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sections of the Matsumoto-Cadavid-Korkmaz Lefschetz fibration

Abstract: We give a maximal set of disjoint (−1)-sections of the well-known Lefschetz fibration constructed by Matsumoto, Cadavid and Korkmaz. In fact, we obtain several such sets for a fixed genus, which implies that the Matsumoto-Cadavid-Korkmaz Lefschetz fibration has more than one supporting minimal Lefschetz pencils. We also determine the diffeomorphism types of the obtained supporting minimal Lefschetz pencils.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a Lefschetz pencil f , the genus of the closure of a regular fiber is called the genus of f . a The first author also found factorizations in [9,10] in different contexts, which in fact can be shown to be Hurwitz equivalent to either Korkmaz-Ozbagci's or Tanaka's.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a Lefschetz pencil f , the genus of the closure of a regular fiber is called the genus of f . a The first author also found factorizations in [9,10] in different contexts, which in fact can be shown to be Hurwitz equivalent to either Korkmaz-Ozbagci's or Tanaka's.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the isomorphism classes of the pencils f n and f s do not depend on the choice of generic projections P 9 P 1 (cf. remark 2.2), one cannot deduce immediately from theorem 1.1 that the isomorphism class of a blow-up of f n does not depend on the choice of blown-up base points (one can indeed find in [10] examples of a pair of non-isomorphic pencils that are obtained by blowing-up a common pencil at the same number but different combinations of base points). We next address this issue by examining the monodromies of f n and f s .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%