The available literature during the period under review (March 1940-March 1942) is chiefly British, and American. In Britain the main emphasis has tended to change from the detection and isolation of all positive cows, including latent carriers, to the detection of only those cows clinically affected and which can be identified by simple methods in the byre. This is mainly due to the advice given to the Ministry of Agriculture by the Agricultural Research Council and the National Veterinary Medical Association. Both bodies put forward recommendations for the control of mastitis and these are embodied in the recent National Scheme of Control (l). The memorandum on the scheme lists the principal factors predisposing to mastitis as (1) overstocking, (2) hurrying the cows before milking, causing damaged teats, (3) incompetent milking by inexpert workers, and (4) ill-managed milking machines. As bacteriological examination of the milk of all cows is not possible the measures of control suggested are (1) daily use of the strip cup, (2) periodic clinical examination, (3) segregation or milking last of the known infected cows, (4) milkers' hands to be scrubbed and washed in disinfectant before and after milking each animal, (5) sterilization of the milking machine and dipping the teat cups in disinfectant after each cow has been milked, and (6) udder cloths to be kept in disinfectant when not in use. The treatment suggested is sulphanilamide per os in acute cases in milking cows and an injection of an acridine dye in chronic cases, especially when nearly or quite dry. Sulphanilamide is supplied at a reduced charge by the state, and free laboratory facilities are available to type the causal organism in cases of doubt. No control measures or treatment are suggested for types of mastitis other than that caused by Streptococcus agalactiae, though it is noted that filling the teats with an antiseptic emulsion before turning out dry cows may be a useful preventive measure in cases due to Corynebacterium pyogenes. The scheme has only recently come into operation and it is too early to assess the results. Similar methods of control have been described by Hucker(2), who reported that the percentage of cows condemned or segregated for mastitis fell from 2-2 to 1-7 in 1,491,325 cows examined over a period of 5 years. He emphasizes the value of proper hygiene, which includes the sterilization of the hands of the milkers and the teat cups of the machines. Harrison (3) has shown that the hands of the milkers habitually harbour Str. agalactiae even in herds where the mastitis infection rate as revealed by bacteriological examination is either low or nil. He has also shown that a detergent is necessary for the removal of the organism from the hands, and that soap and water are the most efficient agents. McCulloch (4) found that non-medicated hard soap was at least as good a disinfectant as hypochlorite at 100 p.p.m. available chlorine. Medicated soaps had no advantage over non-medicated. He advocates household lye, i.e. 97-5% NaOH, at ...