1984
DOI: 10.1080/00140138408963523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secretaries at work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of computerization on the work process of women office workers proved easier to assess, largely through case studies. Here, the implementation of IT, specifically in the form of word processing, was generally found to have little impact; the organization of office work and particularly the sexual division of labour 319 remained intact (Silverstone and Towler, 1984;Webster, 1990;Liff, 1993).…”
Section: Changes In Labour Processes?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effects of computerization on the work process of women office workers proved easier to assess, largely through case studies. Here, the implementation of IT, specifically in the form of word processing, was generally found to have little impact; the organization of office work and particularly the sexual division of labour 319 remained intact (Silverstone and Towler, 1984;Webster, 1990;Liff, 1993).…”
Section: Changes In Labour Processes?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also early studies of office automation and women's work portrayed secretarial work as involving professional skills such as abstract thinking, planning, and servicing people from inside and outside the organization in various ways (e.g. Lie and Rasmussen 1985;Webster 1986;Silverstone and Towler 1984).…”
Section: The Invisible Skills In Women's Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was early concern that the programme was not improving male or female entry to "non-traditional" sectors (Towers and Magill, 1995), a pattern reflected in the latest statistics for the MA (EOC, 2004). The persistent nature of gender segregation has given rise to a large research literature on gender and occupational stereotypes (see inter alia Eagly, 1983;Silverstone and Towler, 1986), and the reasons why males and females "choose" particular sorts of jobs (see inter alia Miller and Budd, 1999;EOC, 2001). This paper reports the findings of research commissioned by the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) which investigated young people's and employers' views on patterns of male and female participation in apprenticeships taken by just one sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%