2016
DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2015.1113553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secrecy, publicity, and the bomb: Nuclear publics and objects of the Nevada Test Site, 1951–1992

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on some of the fundamental insights generated by early sociological (Simmel, 1906) and social-psychological (Goffman, 1959) analyses of concealment, security researchers are moving beyond the study of this or that secret, and beginning to focus on secrecy, understood as the social processes of keeping and revealing secrets (Costas and Grey, 2016: 7). In the past few years we have seen an exciting wave of security research exploring secrecy (De Goede and Wesseling, 2017; Kearns, 2017; Neocleous, 2003; Paglen, 2010; Anaïs and Walby, 2015; Grondin and Shah, 2016), or ‘adjacent concepts’ (Costas and Grey, 2016: 2) like in/visibility (Van Veeren, 2017), ignorance (Rappert, 2012), conspiracy and non-knowledge (Aradau, 2017) and also the methodological challenges of researching ‘closed’ worlds (De Goede et al, 2020). I call this work ‘new secrecy research’ to distinguish it from the more conventional focus on revealing and exposing security secrets, or assessing the strategic merits of secrecy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on some of the fundamental insights generated by early sociological (Simmel, 1906) and social-psychological (Goffman, 1959) analyses of concealment, security researchers are moving beyond the study of this or that secret, and beginning to focus on secrecy, understood as the social processes of keeping and revealing secrets (Costas and Grey, 2016: 7). In the past few years we have seen an exciting wave of security research exploring secrecy (De Goede and Wesseling, 2017; Kearns, 2017; Neocleous, 2003; Paglen, 2010; Anaïs and Walby, 2015; Grondin and Shah, 2016), or ‘adjacent concepts’ (Costas and Grey, 2016: 2) like in/visibility (Van Veeren, 2017), ignorance (Rappert, 2012), conspiracy and non-knowledge (Aradau, 2017) and also the methodological challenges of researching ‘closed’ worlds (De Goede et al, 2020). I call this work ‘new secrecy research’ to distinguish it from the more conventional focus on revealing and exposing security secrets, or assessing the strategic merits of secrecy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, paying attention to materials, to intangible artifacts, though only ever partial, and showing where they resist or refused, shows us how secret operations are not just acts of occluding/hiding information, of segregating knowledge, but are intensely spatial and material. These are insights already artfully demonstrated in the literature on secrecy practices that bear examination in the light of cybersecurity knowledge practices (Anaïs & Walby, 2016;Birchall, 2014;Paglen, 2010). This approach casts a critical eye on the way that the traces are produced by technics and spokespersons.…”
Section: Conclusion: Assembling Cybersecuritymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The photographs provided documentary evidence of the abandoned buildings and landscapes and, before departing, Walby was inspired by Edward Burtynsky's landscape photographs of stunning and tainted places. Examining decommissioned industrial sites and abandoned mining towns through the lenses of social and environmental justice, the research explores the methodological implications of visual methods (also see Balayannis, 2019Balayannis, , 2020Anaïs and Walby, 2016). To this end, Walby contends there is something about place that eludes visual methods, especially photography, which is consistent with a counter-visual analysis: examining what is communicated through the invisible, as opposed to focusing on (readily) apparent narratives, cues, and significations.…”
Section: B R I N G I N G V I S U a L A R T S A N D S O C I A L S C I ...mentioning
confidence: 99%